House of Commons · General Debate
09 July 2026 · 11 other contributors
Opened by Chi Onwurah Lab Newcastle upon Tyne Central
Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.
Chi Onwurah raised concerns about science diplomacy in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.
Key points
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.
Opened the debate
The UK's scientific strengths are in the premier league but its science diplomacy is not clear. The report highlights three main issues: failing to adapt to geopolitics, lack of overarching strategy, and a global race for sovereign capability. It also recommends four areas for improvement including strengthening international policy, publishing a coherent science diplomacy strategy, defining sovereignty, supporting innovation, and improving research security.
Asked about the need for clarity on what 'sovereignty' means in the context of technological capability.
Responded that the report calls for greater clarity on sovereignty to help businesses and academia understand where they should invest and how government procurement can support these efforts.
Asked about barriers to developing sovereignty, particularly highlighting the lack of access to deep capital markets at later stages of start-ups’ development.
Responded by recommending supporting funds dedicated to long-term funding for deep tech companies that require a substantial investment and may not yield immediate returns.
Expressed pleasure in the announcement of SaxaVord space station's upcoming rocket launch, within three weeks.
Asked if the Select Committee on Science and Technology agrees with the recommendation of the Scottish Affairs Committee to have a Minister for space due to the cross-cutting nature of issues in the sector.
Responded by thanking Patricia Ferguson and acknowledged the importance of having clarity on responsibilities within the UK Government regarding space. Highlighted that space is economically important, involves defence issues, and requires coordination across different jurisdictions.
Asked how to improve access to capital for tech start-ups and inquired about the Government's ability to establish a new fund to support these businesses at the pace needed for them to grow.
Suggested encouraging growth of specialist funds with deep sectorial expertise and recommended that Government procurement should be used to attract tech companies by providing timely contracts. Emphasised the importance of attracting international talent.
Expressed support for focusing on science diplomacy and asked about opportunities to prioritise work between science, technology and innovation network staff in embassies.
Acknowledged the valuable work of SINs/SATs/SAINTs (clarification requested by Alan Gemmell), emphasising their role as a successful example of science diplomacy.