← Back to House of Commons Debates
Home Office and Ministry of Justice
29 June 2026
Lead MP
Geoffrey Clifton-Brown
Debate Type
General Debate
Tags
Policing & ResourcesJustice & CourtsScience & Technology
Other Contributors: 12
At a Glance
Geoffrey Clifton-Brown raised concerns about home office and ministry of justice in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
The debate highlights the significant expenditure of £15.5 billion by the Ministry of Justice in 2024-25, emphasising the interconnected nature of issues within the criminal justice system such as police productivity, court backlogs, prison overcrowding, and probation inefficiencies. The speaker argues that these challenges cannot be addressed independently but require a cohesive approach with better data integration, increased funding, and reform measures to enhance efficiency and public safety.
The Cotswolds
The hon. Member argues that the current expenditure of £15.5 billion by the Ministry of Justice is insufficient to address mounting pressures such as police productivity, court backlogs, prison overcrowding, and probation inefficiencies. He points out a 4% increase in the departmental expenditure limit for resource spending but notes this does not sufficiently cover rising demand, inflationary pressures, or higher costs. The member stresses the need for integrated data systems to improve efficiency across all parts of the justice system.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
The hon. Member agrees that retraining and rehabilitation efforts in prisons can help prevent recidivism but emphasises that these measures must be supported by ongoing community-based interventions to ensure lasting positive change for reintegrated individuals.
Andrew Slaughter
Lab
Hammersmith
Discusses the need for continued investment in prison capacity and improvements to probation services. Mentions the anticipated increase in prison population despite reforms under the Sentencing Act. Addresses issues such as overcrowding, drug crises, and the backlog of cases in Crown courts.
Asks about the contribution curtailing the right to jury trials will make towards reducing the Crown court backlog.
Sarah Russell
Con
Waveney
The Government have made considerable progress on criminal legal aid, but there are issues with IT systems at the Legal Aid Agency. The capital spend reduction by 75% seems unclear, and it would be helpful if the Minister could clarify this. The justice system has experienced cuts since 1997, leading to an increase in unrepresented litigants. Assessments on whether moving up legal aid criteria for entitlement might change court backlog dimensions need to be reviewed. There is a concern about people not having lawyers increasing trial times and backlogs.
Newcastle upon Tyne North
The hon. Member emphasised the importance of addressing delays in the criminal justice system, citing a case where a young woman who reported child sexual abuse is still waiting for an 'achieving best evidence' interview with police due to repeated delays and cancellations. She highlighted the significant effects on both public finances and vulnerable individuals, noting that more than one-fourth of rape investigations ended because victims could no longer continue their involvement. The hon. Member welcomed the Government's decision to lift the cap on court sitting days but stressed the need for a fit-for-purpose court estate to maximise efficiency. She also discussed structural issues in Newcastle Crown Court, including maintenance challenges and the impact of delays on vulnerable victims and witnesses.
Jessica Brown-Fuller
Lib Dem
Brent North
Expresses concern over the criminal justice system, highlighting issues such as underinvestment, crumbling infrastructure, and high court backlogs. Criticises the government's proposed reforms for jury trials, arguing they are unnecessary and that uncapping sitting days is a more effective solution to reduce backlog. Calls for better victim support measures, including free access to court transcripts for victims. Raises concerns about prison conditions, overcrowding, violence, and lack of rehabilitation programmes. Emphasises the need for improved education within prisons and mentoring programmes post-release to reduce reoffending rates. Discusses probation service issues such as high caseloads and poor retention due to low pay and inadequate training.
Kieran Mullan
Con
Leicester South
The Member criticises the current Labour government's plans for early release of serious criminals, citing concerns about victims and misrepresentations by Ministers. He also discusses challenges in prison management and court backlogs, advocating against changes to jury trials and calling for better support for police forces.
Sarah Sackman
Lab
Lancaster and Fleetwood
The Government have taken decisive action to address the backlog in courts by investing £2.78 billion and £287 million in capital spend, reversing cuts made during Conservative rule. The investment in workforce development for judges, prosecutors, defence lawyers and court staff is crucial. Victim support services received a £0.5 billion investment, improving access to transcripts and audio recordings in magistrates courts. Efficiency improvements include an oversight board overseeing prisoner transport contracts, the adoption of AI data-driven tools, and remote participation technology. Sentencing reforms aim to reduce Crown court backlog by moving triable either-way cases heard in magistrate courts faster than those in Crown courts. The Government also invested £700 million in probation services for better risk assessment and management on release. Early release schemes are subject to tagging and control measures.
The Cotswolds
Questioned the Minister about releasing serious offenders under early release scheme, highlighting concerns over lack of proper risk assessments.
Challenged the Minister's accuracy on the automatic nature of releases for those serving standard determinate sentences without consideration of risk assessment.
The Cotswolds
Member of Parliament Geoffrey Clifton-Brown acknowledges the constructive nature of the debate and expresses concerns about the early release scheme, citing potential risks associated with releasing serious criminals. He also highlights the high reoffending rate at around 50% and emphasises the importance of providing prisoners with meaningful education and training to reduce recidivism. Additionally, he raises doubts about the effectiveness of measures such as tagging for serious offenders post-release.
Government Response
The Government have made significant investments in court infrastructure, workforce development, victim support services, efficiency improvements through AI tools, remote participation technology, sentencing reforms to expedite triable either-way cases heard by magistrates courts, substantial investment in probation services for better risk assessment and management on release. Early release schemes are subject to tagging and control measures.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.