← Back to House of Commons Debates
The Royal Albert Hall (Charitable Corporation) Bill - Revival Motion
15 June 2026
Lead MP
John Whittingdale
Debate Type
Bill Debate
Tags
Culture, Media & Sport
Other Contributors: 11
At a Glance
John Whittingdale raised concerns about the royal albert hall (charitable corporation) bill - revival motion in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.
How the Debate Unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said:
Lead Contributor
Opened the debate
I am pleased to support the revival motion before the House today. The Bill is necessary and beneficial for the Royal Albert Hall, which operates on a unique public-private partnership model established by Prince Albert in 1867. Seat holders are members of the corporation who elect 18 out of 23 trustees and make an annual financial contribution called the seat rate. There is legal uncertainty surrounding the practice of seat holders agreeing to forgo their tickets for certain performances, which could cost the hall £1.8 million if not resolved. The Bill aims to maintain the current beneficial model that supports the hall's charitable activities.
Asked for reassurance regarding conflicts of interest where seat holders also take trustee decisions. Noted concerns about financial gain and wanted assurance that proposed processes address these issues.
Suggested an agreed resale price for tickets instead of pooling money from sales through the hall’s box office. Proposed this as a compromise to address concerns over ticket resales and conflicts of interest.
Emily Thornberry
Lab
Islington South and Finsbury
Ms. Thornberry argues that private seat owners should not profit from the Royal Albert Hall's charitable events, such as those for charity causes like Teenage Cancer Trust, due to conflicts of interest among trustees. She calls for legislative changes to stop the sale of tickets through backroom deals and insists on transparency in ticket sales.
Simon Hoare
Con
North Dorset
Mr. Hoare intervenes to correct Ms. Thornberry's assertion that the Government bailed out the Royal Albert Hall during covid, stating it was a loan rather than a bailout.
Maldon
Mr. Whittingdale intervenes to emphasise that seat holders contributed £2 million above their normal obligations during the pandemic, highlighting their support and generosity towards the Royal Albert Hall.
Jonathan Davies
Lab
Cardiff North
The Royal Albert Hall hosts many events that could not be hosted elsewhere, particularly large-scale choral and classical music. The hall’s governance arrangements are peculiar but normal in this instance. I encourage the proposers of the Bill to work with this House and the other place to make sure that we get it over the line.
Emily Thornberry
Lab
Islington South and Finsbury
The long title of the Bill is so restrictive that very little can be added to ensure that the governance of the Royal Albert Hall is sorted out. The House of Lords has struggled with this.
Peter Swallow
Lab
Dulwich and West Norwood
If amendments were made to the Bill, I fear that the proposers would simply choose to withdraw it from consideration.
Nigel Huddleston
Con
Mid Worcestershire
The Royal Albert Hall is a vital part of our tourism ecosystem, our cultural history and our cultural offering. I am one of the biggest supporters of the arts, culture and heritage.
Jim Shannon
DUP
Strangford
I have constituents who go to events at the Royal Albert Hall two or three times a year. We must consider our constituents and those who buy tickets in order to travel from Northern Ireland.
Ian Murray
Lab
Edinburgh South
The Bill drew strong opposition in the other place for not tackling this conflict of interest, and it is disappointing that it has not tackled it. The Charity Commission maintains its concerns that the Bill does not fully address the hall’s long-standing conflict of interest.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy
About House of Commons Debates
House of Commons debates take place in the main chamber of the House of Commons. These debates cover a wide range of topics including government policy, legislation, and current affairs. MPs from all parties can participate, question ministers, and hold the government accountable for its decisions.