Commons Sense

House of Commons · Adjournment Debate

Heathrow Airport: Third Runway

14 May 2026 · 2 other contributors

Opened by Sarah Olney Lib Dem Richmond Park

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Sarah Olney raised concerns about heathrow airport: third runway in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

Key points

  • The debate on a third runway at Heathrow has been ongoing for over three decades.
  • The current proposal faces challenges due to doubled costs and an additional 300,000 flights.
  • Olney urges the Minister to base decisions on unbiased data and highlights the potential negative environmental impacts.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Sarah Olney Lib Dem Richmond Park

The debate surrounding a third runway at Heathrow has stretched over three decades, with the Liberal Democrats opposing expansion due to overstated economic benefits and unavoidable environmental consequences. The current proposal is problematic, as costs have doubled and an additional 300,000 flights would hinder net zero targets. Despite this, on January 29, 2025, the Chancellor supported a third runway at Heathrow. Olney urges the Minister to base decisions on unbiased data rather than political expediency. She notes that the Department for Transport’s appraisal report shows a net present value ranging from £3.3 billion to minus £2.2 billion. With Heathrow already in debt, concerns remain about funding and private financing. Noise pollution impacts are severe, with 325,000 more people falling within significantly affected decibel levels. Olney also questions the economic case for expansion and highlights environmental challenges, including carbon emissions and air quality issues. She concludes by asking if Heathrow’s expansion can comply with net zero targets.

Other contributors (2)
  • Munira Wilson Lib Dem Croydon Central

    Wilson thanked Olney for securing the debate, reiterated concerns about economic and environmental costs of a third runway at Heathrow, and questioned the reliability of sustainable aviation fuel to mitigate pollution.

  • Ghani asked if permissions had been sought appropriately, to which Wilson assented.

Government Response

Keir Mather thanked Olney for the debate and noted engagement on the topic. He promised further discussions with communities affected by Heathrow expansion, ensuring public transport mode share targets are considered during the ANPS review. Mather acknowledged the importance of economic growth through air connectivity, noting contributions from the aviation sector to GDP and employment. The Minister emphasised the need to get the process right by considering all views and providing adequate scrutiny. He expressed willingness to engage with constituents regarding surface access impacts and mitigations.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy