Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Crime and Policing Bill (Ways and Means)

14 April 2026 · 1 other contributor

Opened by Andy McDonald Lab Middlesbrough

Crime & Law EnforcementDemocracy & Elections

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Andy McDonald raised concerns about crime and policing bill (ways and means) in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Mr McDonald argues that the House should be given a separate vote on Lords amendment 312.
  • He believes the amendment represents a significant erosion of civil liberties under articles 9, 10, and 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
  • Mr McDonald criticises the Government for not allowing a singular vote on this matter.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Andy McDonald Lab Middlesbrough

Mr McDonald argues that the House should be given a separate vote on Lords amendment 312, which he believes represents a significant erosion of civil liberties under articles 9, 10, and 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights. He criticises the Government for not allowing a singular vote on this matter, suggesting it is disrespectful to Parliament and undermines the rights to peaceful protest.

Other contributors (1)
  • Caroline Nokes Con

    Ms Nokes responds that if Members are dissatisfied with [K the programming of the Bill, they can express their discontent by disagreei [9D [K disagreeing with the programme motion. She explains that under Standing Ord [3D [K Order No. 83F, a separate vote on Mr McDonald's motion would be possible on [2D [K only before 7 pm.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy