Commons Sense

House of Commons · Adjournment Debate

Asbestos-related Lung Cancer: Compensation Act 2006

16 March 2026 · 2 other contributors

Opened by Douglas McAllister Lab West Dunbartonshire

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Douglas McAllister raised concerns about asbestos-related lung cancer: compensation act 2006 in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

Key points

  • MP raised concerns about the Compensation Act 2006 treating victims of asbestos-related lung cancer unfairly
  • West Dunbartonshire highlighted as a hotspot with over 340 asbestos-related deaths since 1980
  • Minister explained legal complexities and the distinction between mesothelioma and lung cancer in compensation claims

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Douglas McAllister Lab West Dunbartonshire

The MP raised the issue of an injustice in how the law treats victims of asbestos-related diseases, particularly lung cancer, under the Compensation Act 2006. He highlighted that although asbestos has been banned for over 25 years, it continues to cause thousands of deaths annually. West Dunbartonshire is among Europe's worst hotspots with over 340 deaths since 1980 due to asbestos exposure. The MP emphasised the historical context and impact on his constituency, noting the shipbuilding industry’s legacy in Clydebank, Dumbarton, and surrounding areas that exposed many workers to asbestos without adequate protection. He explained legal background and recent rulings affecting compensation claims for mesothelioma, urging a review of section 3 to support lung cancer sufferers equally.

Other contributors (2)
  • Jim Shannon DUP Strangford

    Mr Shannon made an intervention but was greeted with remarks about his tardiness by Nusrat Ghani.

  • Nusrat Ghani Con Wealden

    Ms Ghani acknowledged Mr Shannon's presence and joked that no Adjournment debate would be complete without him, despite being late.

Government Response

The Minister thanked Douglas McAllister for raising the issue and praised his advocacy. She explained the legal complexities around causation in negligence cases involving asbestos exposure and the distinction between divisible and indivisible injuries. The Compensation Act 2006 was highlighted as a response to judicial rulings that affected compensation claims, particularly for mesothelioma victims. However, the Minister indicated that current law does not extend similar protections to asbestos-related lung cancer sufferers due to different legal interpretations. She assured continued support through industrial injuries disablement benefit and noted ongoing Scottish Government plans to replace this with employment injury assistance. While acknowledging the complexity of the issue, she committed to discussing potential reviews or developments in the law with relevant stakeholders.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy