Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Domestic Abuse (Pets)

10 March 2026 · 1 other contributor

Opened by Ruth Jones Lab Newport West and Islwyn

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Ruth Jones raised concerns about domestic abuse (pets) in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Ruth Jones argues for legal protection of pets in domestic abuse cases, citing a 51% pet ownership rate among UK adults.
  • The Dogs Trust reports that 97% of domestic abuse professionals have handled cases where pets were harmed.
  • Ruby's law seeks to include pets in non-molestation and occupation orders and amend definitions to cover pet-related abuse.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Ruth Jones Lab Newport West and Islwyn

Ruth Jones argues that pets should receive legal protection in domestic abuse cases, as 51% of UK adults own pets and pets are often used as tools of coercion and control. The Dogs Trust found that 97% of domestic abuse professionals have dealt with cases where pets are harmed. Ruby’s law aims to incorporate pets into non-molestation and occupation orders, amend definitions of controlling or coercive behaviour to include pet-related abuse, and extend Domestic Abuse Protection Orders to pets. The Bill would also allow veterinary records and digital evidence of pet harm to be admissible in court, and require offenders to attend intervention programmes addressing the link between animal cruelty and domestic violence.

Other contributors (1)
  • Ruth Jones Lab Newport West and Islwyn

    Ruby’s law seeks to address gaps in family law protections by including pets in non-molestation and occupation orders, amending the Domestic Violence Act 2021 to explicitly reference pet abuse, and allowing veterinary records and digital evidence to be admissible in court. The Bill would help protect victims of domestic abuse and their pets from further harm.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy