Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Restoration and Renewal Client Board

26 February 2026 · 2 other contributors

Opened by Meg Hillier Labour (Co-op) Hackney South and Shoreditch

Parliamentary Procedure

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Meg Hillier raised concerns about restoration and renewal client board in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Concerns raised during the debate on the Restoration and Renewal Client Board
  • Specific asks of the government were not recorded
  • No commitments were made during the debate

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Other contributors (2)
  • Meg Hillier Lab Co-op Hackney South and Shoreditch

    Expresses concern about the ongoing delay in starting major works on the Palace of Westminster, noting that discussions have been going on since 2016. She questions whether a vote will take place by 2030 and highlights safety risks due to asbestos and fire risk.

  • Nick Smith Lab Blaenau Gwent and Rhymney

    Outlines the timeline for the restoration and renewal programme, including seven years of foundational works starting after approval from both Houses. He agrees with Meg Hillier's concerns about safety risks and emphasises the necessity of moving forward to avoid further costs.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy