Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Call Lists

09 February 2026 · 3 other contributors

Opened by Judith Cummins Lab Bradford South

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Judith Cummins raised concerns about call lists in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Introduced the Select Committee statement on behalf of the Procedure Committee
  • Set out the rules for the debate
  • Emphasised that questions should be directed to Lee Dillon and not the Government Minister

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Judith Cummins Lab Bradford South

Introduced the Select Committee statement on behalf of the Procedure Committee, setting out the rules for the debate. Emphasised that questions should be directed to Lee Dillon and not the Government Minister.

Other contributors (3)
  • Lee Dillon Lib Dem Newbury

    Spoke on behalf of the Procedure Committee about their fourth report of the Session, which examined the idea of introducing call lists. Emphasised that after careful consideration and evidence-based analysis, the committee concluded that call lists should not be introduced due to concerns over spontaneity, fairness, and procedural balance.

  • Julian Lewis Con New Forest East

    Fully agreed with Lee Dillon's statement, congratulating him on an excellent contribution. Highlighted the rarity of agreeing with every word spoken in a Committee statement.

  • Jim Shannon DUP Strangford

    Agreed with Julian Lewis and Lee Dillon, praising the spontaneity in parliamentary debates and expressing no need for change despite his tendency to be called last in debates. Emphasised the importance of maintaining traditional debate practices.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy