Commons Sense

House of Commons · Urgent Question

Chinese Embassy 2026-01-13

13 January 2026 · 29 other contributors

Opened by Alicia Kearns Con Rutland and Stamford

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Alicia Kearns raised concerns about chinese embassy 2026-01-13 in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

Key points

  • Concerns about security risks and proximity to critical communication cables were raised regarding the proposed Chinese embassy at Royal Mint Court.
  • The case for the new embassy is currently under consideration by the Department for Planning Ministers.
  • A decision will be published by January 20, 2026, following a quasi-judicial process and public inquiry.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Alicia Kearns Con Rutland and Stamford

Will the Minister confirm the status of the release of unredacted plans for the proposed Chinese embassy at Royal Mint Court, given concerns about security risks and the proximity to critical communication cables?

Other contributors (29)
  • Alicia Kearns Con Rutland and Stamford

    Question

    Had any Minister seen the unredacted plans before The Telegraph uncovered them? If not, why not? Was Parliament misled when we were told that all documents were publicly available? Does the Government plan to re-route cables if approved?

    Minister reply

    No decision has been made. All inquiry documents are publicly available on the Tower Hamlets website. Security concerns will be addressed in line with the process.

  • Sarah Champion Lab Rotherham

    Question

    Multiple Government agencies have raised concerns about this mega-embassy. Internationally, China is viewed as a hostile state to the UK. How does the Government intend to proceed given these security risks?

    Minister reply

    We recognise that China poses national security threats but also presents economic opportunities. A consistent and pragmatic approach will be maintained without compromising our security.

  • Calum Miller LD Bicester and Woodstock

    Question

    Will the Government ensure intelligence agencies update their risk assessments before a final decision is taken? Will they meet protesters on Saturday outside the proposed site?

    Minister reply

    All material considerations will be taken into account when making a decision. Specific national security concerns cannot be commented upon due to the live nature of the application.

  • Edward Leigh Con Gainsborough

    Question

    The right hon. Gentleman asked about the Chinese Government’s failure to respond regarding a perimeter wall around a historical site near the proposed embassy location, which could impact planning considerations.

    Minister reply

    All material considerations will be taken into account when reaching a decision on this case.

  • Alex Sobel Lab/Co-op Leeds Central and Headingley

    Question

    The Joint Committee on Human Rights has found that the Chinese state undertakes considerable transnational repression against members of the Chinese diaspora in the UK, particularly those critical of Beijing. Will this be a material consideration?

    Minister reply

    All relevant planning considerations will be taken into account when making a decision.

  • Julian Lewis Con New Forest East

    Question

    Has the Intelligence and Security Committee had an opportunity to question the National Security Adviser about this matter?

    Minister reply

    It is not appropriate for me to comment on any specific matters of national security in this instance.

  • Rushanara Ali Lab Bethnal Green and Stepney

    Question

    Residents in my constituency have significant concerns about the proposed embassy regarding security, human rights, and local impacts. Will these be taken seriously as part of the process?

    Minister reply

    All material considerations will be taken into account when making the decision.

  • Bobby Dean LD Carshalton and Wallington

    Question

    The Government’s response treats this development solely as a planning matter, but it has huge diplomatic consequences. Will national security and diplomatic importance also be considered?

    Minister reply

    All material considerations will be taken into account.

  • Lillian Jones Lab Kilmarnock and Loudoun

    Question

    Given the publication of unredacted plans for the Chinese embassy, will the Government and security services look again at whether it is appropriate to allow the embassy to proceed?

    Minister reply

    All material considerations will be taken into account.

  • Julian Smith Con Skipton and Ripon

    Question

    The site of the proposed embassy is massive and restricted, making it impossible to monitor activities. Is this judgment call on getting a closer relationship with China wrong?

    Minister reply

    I note the right hon. Gentleman’s concerns but reiterate that all material considerations will be taken into account.

  • Mark Sewards Lab Leeds South West and Morley

    Question

    My constituent faces a £100,000 bounty under the national security law in Hong Kong. What assurances can the Government give to ensure her safety if the new embassy is approved?

    Minister reply

    We will not tolerate transnational repression of this kind and the decision will be made on relevant planning considerations.

  • Chris Law SNP Dundee Central

    Question

    What action are the Government taking to counter increased threats from the proposed mega-embassy to those communities facing transnational repression?

    Minister reply

    We have reviewed transnational repression through the defending democracy taskforce and take it seriously, but this is primarily a planning decision.

  • James Naish Lab Rushcliffe

    Question

    What reassurances can be given that the Prime Minister’s commitment to no delays in granting permission for the mega-embassy has not compromised the independence of the planning process?

    Minister reply

    The planning process has not been compromised and we will make a decision on or before 20 January.

  • Christine Jardine LD Edinburgh West

    Question

    The Minister is avoiding answering concerns about safety and security for constituents, especially regarding redacted photographs showing proximity to critical communications cables. Can he assure them that their safety is a priority?

    Minister reply

    The hon. Lady's constituents can be reassured as all material considerations will be taken into account by the relevant Ministers when making a decision on this case.

  • Andrew Murrison Con South West Wiltshire

    Question

    Will the Minister ensure that security agencies closely monitor demolition and replacement of the wall near critical infrastructure to safeguard national security?

    Minister reply

    I note the right hon. Gentleman's question, and assure him that all material considerations will be taken into account in the decision-making process.

  • Paul Kohler LD Wimbledon

    Question

    What explanation has been given for redactions in the original application regarding important details?

    Minister reply

    The Department sought further information via a reference-back letter to parties on 6 August, as it did not feel that it had all necessary information at the time.

  • David Reed Con Exmouth and Exeter East

    Question

    Given past decisions regarding Huawei and civil nuclear, will the Minister take responsibility for this matter by stepping in to pull the plug on the proposal?

    Minister reply

    Planning Ministers will make a decision taking into account all material planning considerations.

  • Carla Lockhart DUP Upper Bann

    Question

    Will the Minister agree that national security should take precedence over planning in this case, and reject the proposal?

    Minister reply

    I cannot provide a running commentary on a live case, but I assure hon. Members that all relevant planning considerations will be taken into account.

  • Sarah Bool Con South Northamptonshire

    Question

    How can the Government accept an embassy proposal that is clearly a threat to national security and not in line with local policies?

    Minister reply

    No decision has been made on this case, but all material considerations will be taken into account.

  • Neil Shastri-Hurst Con Solihull West and Shirley

    Question

    Has any Government Minister called in the Chinese ambassador to discuss these issues?

    Minister reply

    I cannot provide a running commentary on a live case, but all material considerations will be taken into account.

  • Bradley Thomas Con Bromsgrove

    Question

    Given security concerns and the proximity of sensitive cabling, should this decision not be made by the Prime Minister in Downing Street with a quick no?

    Minister reply

    All national security considerations will be taken into account when making a decision.

  • Ian Roome LD North Devon

    Question

    Given the intertwining of planning and national security, should the Minister review proximity of other countries’ embassies to major underground fibre-optic cables?

    Minister reply

    All material considerations will be taken into account in this planning case.

  • Blake Stephenson Con Mid Bedfordshire

    Question

    Does the Minister recognise that approving this embassy could pave the way for economic war and undermine critical data security?

    Minister reply

    All national security considerations will be taken into account when reaching a decision.

  • Cameron Thomas LD Tewkesbury

    Question

    Given that the Chinese Communist party is not a friend to the UK, can the Minister do the right thing for national security by rejecting this proposal?

    Minister reply

    All material considerations will be taken into account when making a decision on this case.

  • Ben Obese-Jecty Con Huntingdon

    Question

    We seem to be in the Chamber every three weeks addressing espionage and security concerns with regards to China. The Chinese previously stated that they would not resubmit their application unless given assurances of approval. What assurances have been given to China, what are we expecting as a quid pro quo for rebuilding our embassy in Beijing, and what concerns have been raised by Five Eyes partners?

    Minister reply

    It is inappropriate for me to comment on national security considerations regarding this live case. The decision will be made based on statutory provisions governing planning decisions and published propriety guidance without any commitments being given.

  • Jim Allister TUV North Antrim

    Question

    Why are the Government so evidently in awe of Chinese requirements, particularly regarding the approval of this mega-embassy before the Prime Minister's visit to Beijing?

    Minister reply

    I reject the characterisation that we are in awe of China. We take a consistent and pragmatic approach while recognising threats posed by China. No decision has yet been made on the case.

  • Joshua Reynolds LD Maidenhead

    Question

    Given my constituent Carmen Lau's harassment by Chinese authorities, does the Minister accept that approving this application while such transnational repression continues would be a kick in the teeth for Hongkongers?

    Minister reply

    The safety of Hongkongers is important to us. However, I cannot comment on a live planning case before Planning Ministers.

  • Jim Shannon DUP Strangford

    Question

    What are the Government doing regarding the raiding of a Protestant church in Chengdu by Chinese authorities? The plans for the embassy show potential risks that must be explored. Will the Minister prove that national security will always be the priority?

    Minister reply

    We recognise the importance of religious freedom and all inquiry information was submitted as part of an independent public inquiry. My Department is seeking further information specifically in relation to redacted plans for this case.

Government Response

This question relates to the proposals for a new Chinese embassy at Royal Mint Court. The case is currently before the Department for consideration, and Planning Ministers must take decisions following a quasi-judicial process based on evidence and planning rules. A public inquiry was held from February to December 2025, with further information sought via reference-back letters. No decision has been made yet; one will be published by January 20, 2026, including all relevant representations and documents.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy