Commons Sense

House of Commons · Adjournment Debate

Ely Railway Upgrade 2025-12-03

03 December 2025 · 5 other contributors

Opened by Charlotte Cane LD Ely and East Cambridgeshire

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Charlotte Cane raised concerns about ely railway upgrade 2025-12-03 in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

Key points

  • Concerns raised about delays in funding and implementation of the Ely area capacity enhancement scheme for rail upgrades.
  • The scheme has a cost-to-benefit ratio of 4.89, indicating significant economic return.
  • Stakeholders are frustrated by the lack of clarity and commitment on detailed planning and funding from the government.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Charlotte Cane LD Ely and East Cambridgeshire

I draw Members' attention to my entry in the Register of Members' Financial Interests as a district councillor for East Cambridgeshire. The outline business case for the Ely area capacity enhancement scheme shows that for every £1 invested, there will be a return of £4.89—so you may wonder why we need a half-hour debate on what is so obviously a great scheme. Yet successive Governments have failed to deliver the scheme. Funding was even promised just in time for the 024 election but was not secured. The Ely area capacity enhancement scheme would upgrade the railway to allow more trains through Ely, improving connectivity and reliability while meeting demand for rail freight between Felixstowe, the west midlands, and the north. It supports sustainable economic growth, strengthens resilience in our transport network, reduces road accidents and congestion, and significantly cuts carbon emissions. The project is estimated to take 98,000 lorry journeys off the road every single year and could result in an extra six freight trains per day from Felixstowe port. The scheme has a £4.89 cost-to-benefit ratio, with national benefits extending beyond Cambridgeshire to regions like Transport for London and Transport for the North. Stakeholders are frustrated by ongoing delays; I ask the Minister to provide clarity and commit to funding detailed planning for the Ely junction upgrade.

Other contributors (5)
  • Daniel Zeichner Lab Cambridge

    The hon. Member's speech makes a strong case, and East West Rail now strengthens the need for resolving network issues in Cambridgeshire.

  • Adrian Ramsay Green Waveney Valley

    We also need to upgrade Haughley junction alongside Ely junction to realise full benefits of moving freight onto rail from Felixstowe through the east to the midlands.

  • Steve Barclay Con North East Cambridgeshire

    Given the previous Government's funding for this project, it is regrettable that Labour cut it. We need better connectivity in Fenland and connections to Cambridge’s growth potential via Manea, March, and Whittlesea stations.

  • Sam Carling Lab North West Cambridgeshire

    The hon. Member for North West Cambridgeshire supported the scheme's potential to unlock significant economic growth in his region and beyond.

  • Asked if schemes with a lower benefit-cost ratio were funded over EACE, questioning the Government's priorities.

Government Response

The Minister acknowledges the importance of the Ely junction upgrade for improving rail freight capacity and connectivity. They have not provided specific funding amounts or detailed timelines but emphasise ongoing consultations and assessments to ensure efficient use of resources. The Government recognises the scheme's benefits, including environmental and economic advantages, but stresses the need for thorough planning before committing significant funds. There is no clear commitment to a meeting with Network Rail or setting a specific timeline for progress. The Minister acknowledged the importance of the Ely Area Capacity Enhancement Programme and recognised the tireless advocacy by Charlotte Cane. She highlighted that while the programme had a strong business case, it was not allocated funding due to current financial constraints. The Government remain committed to supporting the scheme as part of future rail enhancements but emphasised the need for further exploration of funding options including third-party contributions. Lilian Greenwood reassured MPs that EACE would continue to be reviewed and prioritised when additional funding becomes available, and she encouraged local stakeholders to engage in updating the business case to align with potential future spending reviews.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy