Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Proposed Solar Development in Wisborough Green 2025-12-02

02 December 2025 · 1 other contributor

Opened by Andrew Griffith Con Arundel and South Downs

ClimateEnvironment

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Andrew Griffith raised concerns about proposed solar development in wisborough green 2025-12-02 in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Andrew Griffith argues against the proposed 25-hectare solar farm in Loxwood and Wisborough Green due to objections from over 174 residents and four parish councils.
  • Griffith states that large-scale solar projects are more appropriate for supermarket rooftops or brownfield sites than nature-rich farmland.
  • Griffith criticises local Liberal Democrats for not opposing the solar farm proposal.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Andrew Griffith Con Arundel and South Downs

Andrew Griffith argues against the proposed construction of a 25-hectare solar farm on nature-rich farmland in Loxwood and Wisborough Green. He highlights that over 174 residents and four separate parish councils have objected to the proposal, emphasising that such large-scale solar projects are better suited for supermarket rooftops or brownfield sites rather than green fields. Griffith criticises local Liberal Democrats for their lack of opposition, suggesting that no green field in Sussex is safe from similar developments.

Other contributors (1)
  • Andrew Griffith Con Arundel and South Downs

    Griffith argues against the proposed solar farm near Wisborough Green. He cites over 174 resident objections and four parish council rejections, stressing that green fields should not be used for large-scale solar projects. The MP emphasises the unsuitability of the land for such a project, noting its negative impacts on the rural setting.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy