Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministerial Statement

China Espionage Government Security Response 2025-11-18

18 November 2025 · 29 other contributors

Opened by The Minister for Security Dan Jarvis

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

The Minister for Security raised concerns about china espionage government security response 2025-11-18 in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

Key points

  • Minister made a statement on Chinese espionage targeting UK democratic institutions and government response.
  • MI5 issued an alert warning MPs, staff, and others about ongoing targeting by Chinese actors.
  • China is attempting to recruit individuals with access to sensitive information through cover companies or headhunters.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Government Statement

Today, I am making a statement on Chinese espionage targeting UK democratic institutions and the government's response to counter these threats. MI5 issued an alert warning Members of Parliament, their staff, and others about ongoing targeting by Chinese actors. China is attempting to recruit individuals with access to sensitive information through cover companies or headhunters. This activity includes cyber-operations targeting parliamentarians' emails in 2021 and recent cases of attempted foreign interference. The government will take all necessary measures to protect national interests, citizens, and democratic life, including working with allies. The government is launching a comprehensive package of measures, including the elections Bill which will include tougher risk assessment rules for donor recipients and enhanced enforcement powers for the Electoral Commission. Additionally, new powers are being worked on to counter foreign interference through proscription-type tools and extended penalties for election interference offences. Protective security campaigns are being launched through the defending democracy taskforce with tailored briefings for devolved governments and political parties. Investments include £170 million for renewing sovereign encrypted technology used by officials, and £130 million next year to build resilience against threats from states like China, including Counter Terrorism Policing's ability to enforce the National Security Act 2023. The government is also working on protecting intellectual property in critical businesses. The statement further addresses challenges in education and advanced manufacturing sectors due to foreign interference risks. Specific actions include raising concerns with counterparts in Beijing, issuing new guidance from the Office for Students, hosting a closed event for vice-chancellors, and strengthening the economic security advisory service for businesses. Further measures against malicious cyber-activity are being introduced through the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill, which will help target critical networks. The government remains committed to disrupting state actors involved in cyber-espionage operations.

Other contributors (29)
  • Richard Burden Lab Coventry North West

    Question

    What are the Government's specific plans for education and research, considering the risks of foreign interference?

    Minister reply

    The government is working to address risks in education through new guidance from the Office for Students to help universities protect academic freedoms. A closed event will be hosted with vice-chancellors to discuss risks posed by foreign interference and signpost plans to further increase resilience.

  • Rupa Huq Lab Ealing Central and Acton

    Question

    How is the Government ensuring businesses in advanced manufacturing are protected from espionage?

    Minister reply

    The new economic security advisory service is being strengthened to help businesses navigate risks such as espionage and intellectual property theft, with digital offers assisting complex cases.

  • Julian Smith Con Skipton and Ripon

    Question

    What are the Government's next steps in countering China’s cyber-attacks?

    Minister reply

    The government is introducing new measures through the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill to make it harder for critical sectors to be targeted with cyber-attacks, including those from China. Further action will be taken against China-based actors involved in malicious activity.

  • Alicia Kearns Con Rutland and Stamford

    Question

    The revelations today are no surprise. They are part of an ever-growing list of actions by the Chinese Communist party to interfere in our sovereign affairs, and it is important that we do not underestimate the threat. Can the Minister give an update on the investigation into dual-use kill switches in Chinese-made electric buses?

    Minister reply

    The work being taken forward will be co-ordinated by the Cabinet Office with a new counter-political interference and espionage plan, but I am limited in what I can say about specific inquiries like those regarding Sheffield Hallam University.

  • Alicia Kearns Con Rutland and Stamford

    Question

    Will the Minister admit that it was a mistake for his party to cancel our university free speech provisions, and will he reintroduce them now?

    Minister reply

    We take very seriously the points made about academic freedoms and the importance of education. We are looking closely at whether it is necessary to make further additions to the enhanced tier of FIRS.

  • Alicia Kearns Con Rutland and Stamford

    Question

    Will the Government now cancel multiple planned visits to China, given the hostile environment?

    Minister reply

    I take a different view about visits to China; engaging with our counterparts provides an opportunity to deliver tough and consistent messages. Any Minister or official who travels will deliver strong coherent messages aligned with today's announcements.

  • John McDonnell Lab Hayes and Harlington

    Question

    Expressed condolences to the family of a Royal Fleet Auxiliary member lost. Raised concerns about the security of Chinese nationals, particularly Hong Kong community members in prison and fears of monitoring demonstrators.

    Minister reply

    Acknowledged the importance of protecting individuals targeted by transnational repression and emphasised that the Government will do everything possible to ensure their safety.

  • Lisa Smart LD Hazel Grove

    Question

    Welcomed the action plan but expressed concerns about its sufficiency in addressing persistent, flagrant transgressions by the CCP. Raised issues regarding the Chinese mega-embassy and requested updates on adding China to the Fraud Investigation Reporting Service.

    Minister reply

    Emphasised that national security is a core priority for any decision related to the embassy and assured that all points raised will be considered by relevant departments.

  • Abtisam Mohamed Lab Sheffield Central

    Question

    Highlighted concerns about academic freedom at Sheffield Hallam University, including intimidation of researchers like Professor Laura Murphy. Asked whether the closed event with vice-chancellors would address these issues.

    Minister reply

    Acknowledged the importance of protecting academic freedom and committed to ensuring that both vice-chancellors from Sheffield will be invited to attend the event.

  • Karen Bradley Con Staffordshire Moorlands

    Question

    Asked about China's current threat to the UK and sought details on work with Members' Staff Services Team to remove security weaknesses.

    Minister reply

    Recognised that China poses significant threats to UK national security, including cyber-attacks and foreign interference. Promised a more considered response regarding security weaknesses.

  • Alex Barros-Curtis Lab Cardiff West

    Question

    Welcomed the measures announced but suggested that the defending democracy taskforce should develop a centralised toolkit for affected stakeholders.

    Minister reply

    Emphasised the importance of the defending democracy taskforce and its role in coordinating protective security campaigns across Government.

  • Tom Tugendhat Con Tonbridge

    Question

    Welcomed the update on connected devices. Raised concerns about the Chancellor's visit to China and suggested increasing US foreign direct investment as an alternative.

    Minister reply

    Acknowledged the points made by Tom Tugendhat regarding connected devices and the need for a balanced approach to engagement with China. Assured that Ministers deliver strong messages about national security during their visits.

  • Emily Darlington Lab Milton Keynes Central

    Question

    Asked about protecting constituents from transnational repression, particularly Hongkongers, and raised concerns about online threats to democracy. Requested a meeting to discuss amendments for the elections Bill.

    Minister reply

    Reiterated that any transnational repression is unacceptable and that the Government supports members of the Hong Kong community relocated to the UK. Agreed to facilitate a meeting with relevant Ministers regarding her proposed amendments.

  • Clive Jones Liberal Democrats Wokingham

    Question

    Asked about protecting the concerns of the Hong Kong community in Wokingham, especially those with bounties on their heads.

    Minister reply

    Reassured that the Government stands with and supports members of the Hong Kong community. Offered to meet Clive Jones to discuss further concerns.

  • Julian Lewis Con New Forest East

    Question

    Asked whether China is a bad faith actor whose technique involves buying influence and building dependency, particularly in universities.

    Minister reply

    Acknowledged that any Government must balance national security with economic interests. Emphasised the need to engage on terms advantageous to the UK.

  • Iain Duncan Smith Con Chingford and Woodford Green

    Question

    Asked if the current tier of FIRS adequately addresses China’s threats, emphasising the importance of national security.

    Minister reply

    Acknowledged the seriousness of the threat but emphasised the need to engage with China on terms advantageous to the UK. Stressed that defence of the realm is a top priority.

  • Jeremy Wright Con Kenilworth and Southam

    Question

    Asked about ensuring the Intelligence and Security Committee has all material needed for judgment on the embassy matter before Christmas.

    Minister reply

    Agreed that it is important to be straightforward and strong in our approach. Suggested that it is not necessarily for him to discuss details of diplomatic relations, as this falls under Foreign Office jurisdiction.

  • Christine Jardine LD Edinburgh West

    Question

    Welcomed the Minister’s comments and called for China to be added to the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering's enhanced tier. She raised concerns about energy security, Chinese consulate in Edinburgh, and espionage threats to Scotland.

    Minister reply

    Acknowledged the importance of engagement with devolved authorities and will reflect on her points about Mingyang wind farm and security concerns.

  • John Hayes Con South Holland and The Deepings

    Question

    Welcomed the statement but asked for a review of contracts with China, particularly those relating to sensitive matters. He also inquired if the Minister would confirm that China is a threat to national security.

    Minister reply

    Acknowledged the ISC report on China and agreed to look into the point about reviewing contracts with China.

  • Andrew Murrison Con South West Wiltshire

    Question

    Welcomed the package but expressed concern over the increasing reliance on critical minerals from China, urging diversification of access.

    Minister reply

    Acknowledged the need for a critical minerals strategy and stated that the Government will bring forward such a strategy led by the Department for Business and Trade.

  • Chris Law SNP Dundee Central

    Question

    Asked if the devolved nations, local authorities and educational institutions are being made aware of risks posed by China. He requested regular briefings.

    Minister reply

    Confirmed that there is a desire to work closely with devolved Administrations and would be happy to meet with him and his group.

  • Mark Pritchard Con The Wrekin

    Question

    Asked if the Government has deterrents in place regarding China's threat. He suggested reviewing security classifications policy.

    Minister reply

    Acknowledged the importance of leaking and gave an assurance that they will review government papers and threats.

  • Richard Tice Reform Boston and Skegness

    Question

    Expressed concern about granting planning consent for China’s embassy, suggesting it would be seen as a sign of weakness.

    Minister reply

    Emphasised the Government's determination to act further where necessary to guard national security.

  • Alison Griffiths Con Bognor Regis and Littlehampton

    Question

    Asked if it was a failure of mindset that led to the failure in securing prosecution against two alleged Chinese agents.

    Minister reply

    Clarified that decisions were taken independently by the Crown Prosecution Service, which is rightly independent of Government.

  • Tom Gordon LD Harrogate and Knaresborough

    Question

    Asked if China should be on the enhanced tier of Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering given its actions.

    Minister reply

    Explained that FIRS is an important tool, and the Government will carefully consider how best to use it.

  • John Cooper Con Dumfries and Galloway

    Question

    Quoted Sun Tzu and questioned why Government facilitates secretive trade trips to Beijing for members of the Scottish Government.

    Minister reply

    Said he would look into it if that would be helpful.

  • Richard Foord LD Honiton and Sidmouth

    Question

    Asked about supporting universities in resisting so-called SLAPPs following a reported case at Sheffield Hallam University.

    Minister reply

    Emphasised the importance of academic freedom and stated that the Government will support universities in responding to challenges.

  • Jim Allister TUV North Antrim

    Question

    In the case of Northern Ireland, international trade is a reserved matter. Last Wednesday in Belfast, the Chinese Government hosted an investment conference with 120 Chinese companies and signed a strategic co-operation framework agreement with Invest NI. How is this possible when international trade is a reserved matter? Will this Government finally closely examine the operation of the Stormont Executive and their collaborations with China?

    Minister reply

    I was in the hon. and learned Member’s part of the world just a couple of weeks ago. We take very seriously the importance of engaging with the devolved Administrations. I will look carefully at the points he has made and reflect on them, and if he wants to discuss them further, I would be happy to do that.

  • Jim Shannon DUP Strangford

    Question

    I chair an all-party parliamentary group which had its website hacked. Conversations were under surveillance while in Northern Ireland due to Chinese agents involved in espionage. How will the Government ensure a ramification for trade outcomes involving such threats? What steps are being taken to prevent mishandling of court cases and send a strong message against foreign powers, particularly China?

    Minister reply

    I am grateful to the hon. Member, as I always am. I hope he sees the commitment this Government have to ensuring that we are best equipped to engage with the nature of the threats we face. This is precisely why I brought forward a package of measures and why I have been crystal clear about the requirement potentially to go further in certain areas. We take these matters very seriously and wish to work with Members right across the House and with the devolved Administrations to do everything possible to guard against such threats while engaging in our national interest.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy