Commons Sense

House of Commons · Adjournment Debate

Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy 2025-06-05

05 June 2025 · 7 other contributors

Opened by Iain Duncan Smith Con Chingford and Woodford Green

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Iain Duncan Smith raised concerns about afghan relocations and assistance policy 2025-06-05 in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

Key points

  • Concerns raised about serious and systemic failings in the Afghan relocations and assistance policy (ARAP) scheme.
  • Luke Pollard acknowledged Sir Iain Duncan Smith's advocacy for reconsidering the ARAP scheme's implementation.
  • Decisions under the ARAP scheme are made against published criteria, which the minister believes to be generous compared to other allied nations.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Iain Duncan Smith Con Chingford and Woodford Green

It is a privilege to rise to move this Adjournment debate about applications to the Afghan relocations and assistance policy, which has come to be known as the ARAP scheme. I intend to raise a deeply troubling case that highlights serious and systemic failings in the operation of ARAP... (Full speech covering the moral obligation towards Afghans who supported UK forces, bureaucratic delays, narrow eligibility criteria, broken promises, and a specific case where an individual's application was rejected despite overwhelming evidence of his contributions to UK security objectives.)

Other contributors (7)
  • Wendy Chamberlain LD North East Fife

    The ARAP scheme does not fit the requirement any longer, and it is quite brutal and inhumane.

  • Julian Lewis Con New Forest East

    Quoted a previous statement by the Defence Secretary on the need to assist Afghan special forces who were trained and funded by the UK.

  • Mark Francois Con Rayleigh and Wickford

    Acknowledged the moral case for supporting Afghans who supported British forces in Afghanistan.

  • Lincoln Jopp Con Spelthorne

    Supported the moral obligation to fulfil our duty towards Afghans and the need to tear up bureaucratic rulebooks if necessary.

  • John Cooper Con Dumfries and Galloway

    Asked if this is a case where rules are being followed punctiliously despite risks.

  • Suggested that when the system says no but the Minister knows it's wrong, there should be an obligation to change the system.

  • Wendy Chamberlain Con North East Fife

    The hon. Member for North East Fife mentioned concerns about communication with applicants regarding their application status.

Government Response

While no specific ministerial response is provided in this excerpt, the debate concludes with a call for reconsideration of the ARAP scheme's implementation to ensure those who supported UK forces during operations in Afghanistan are protected. Luke Pollard thanked Sir Iain Duncan Smith for raising the issue and acknowledged his advocacy. He noted that decisions are made against published criteria, which he believes to be the most generous in comparison to other allied nations. However, he recognised the need to address exceptional cases like this one and is willing to explore additional opportunities to provide support. The Minister emphasised the importance of making decisions correctly according to the eligibility criteria set by the previous government, while also highlighting efforts made for the Triples, a specific group within ARAP. He reassured that individuals have access to reviews and expedited decisions if their life safety is threatened. The Minister acknowledged the concerns raised by the right hon. Gentleman and emphasised that phase 1 of the Triples review has achieved an overturn rate of around 30%, with a written ministerial statement published last month providing full details. The record-keeping during the period in question was not adequate, leading to an examination of top-up payments as part of phase 2, which aims to re-examine eligibility criteria based on relationships created through these payments. The Minister expressed his deep commitment to honouring obligations towards those who served alongside UK forces and clarified that the ARAP scheme is designed to support individuals with a close connection to UK forces, often defined by contractual or payment relationships. Concerns regarding understanding of the application process were addressed with plans to introduce new communications from autumn onwards to help applicants understand their case progress better. The Minister also mentioned performance indicators set for September aimed at helping people rate the Ministry of Defence's performance. He reiterated the government's objective to complete the Afghan resettlement scheme obligations and bring them to a close.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy