Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

UK-USA Trade Agreements (Parliamentary Scrutiny) 2025-04-30

30 April 2025 · 1 other contributor

Opened by Richard Foord LD Honiton and Sidmouth

BrexitDemocracy & ElectionsBusiness & Trade

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Richard Foord raised concerns about uk-usa trade agreements (parliamentary scrutiny) 2025-04-30 in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Calls for parliamentary scrutiny before implementing trade agreements with the USA due to concerns over agriculture and food industries, data rights, and democratic oversight.
  • Current scrutiny mechanisms are deemed inadequate, permitting agreements to be rushed without thorough analysis or public consultation.
  • Proposes a Bill requiring Parliament's approval for any trade agreement with the USA.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Richard Foord LD Honiton and Sidmouth

Calls for parliamentary scrutiny before implementing trade agreements with the USA, citing concerns about harm to agriculture and food industries, data rights, and democratic oversight. Emphasises that current scrutiny mechanisms are inadequate, allowing deals to be rushed without proper analysis or public consultation. Proposes a Bill requiring Parliament’s approval for any such agreement.

Other contributors (1)
  • David Davis Con Goole and Pocklington

    Raises concerns about the Independent Press Standards Organisation's ruling against The Daily Telegraph, suggesting it undermines press freedom and the right to report on parliamentary proceedings. Emphasises the historical importance of free reporting from this House.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy