Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministerial Statement

Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] 2025-02-25

25 February 2025 · 47 other contributors

Opened by The Secretary of State for Education Bridget Phillipson

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

The Secretary of State for Education raised concerns about institute for apprenticeships and technical education (transfer of functions etc) bill [lords] 2025-02-25 in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

Key points

  • We are a country with incredible talent, industry, and invention.
  • There is a wide gap in skills within the workforce, impacting individuals, businesses, communities, and the nation.
  • Half a million job vacancies remain unfilled due to skill mismatches since 2011.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Government Statement

We are a country with incredible talent, industry, and invention. Despite our strengths in research, manufacturing, professional services, and creative industries, there is a wide gap in skills within the workforce, impacting individuals, businesses, communities, and the nation as a whole. Half a million job vacancies remain unfilled due to skill mismatches, a critical issue since 2011 when data collection began. The country has fallen behind its neighbours regarding higher technical qualifications, with over 90% of employers valuing basic digital skills but more than 7 million adults lacking them. This skills gap hinders economic growth and limits individuals' opportunities to achieve their ambitions. Bridget Phillipson announced a commitment to reform the apprenticeship levy into a growth and skills levy, offering shorter-duration and foundation apprenticeships in targeted sectors. She also highlighted the importance of providing diverse pathways for young people, including technical training routes through apprenticeships while valuing university education when appropriate. The minister emphasised that Skills England will play a crucial role in addressing these issues, focusing on improving opportunities for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to offer apprenticeships.

Other contributors (47)
  • Ashley Fox Con Bridgwater

    Question

    The Secretary of State agrees that employers cannot spend the money from the apprenticeship levy easily and that too much is retained by the Treasury. Will she undertake to speak to the Chancellor to make it easier for employers to spend this money on training?

    Minister reply

    I can assure the hon. Gentleman that the Chancellor is as committed as I am to ensuring we have the right skills within the economy, because without them we will not be able to deliver economic growth. We are committed to reforming the failing apprenticeship levy into a growth and skills levy with more flexibility for employers.

  • John Hayes Con South Holland and The Deepings

    Question

    While welcoming the commitment to skills, does the Secretary of State recognise that too often young people are advised towards academic careers rather than practical learning? This means there are many graduates in non-graduate jobs owing a lot of money with pretty useless degrees.

    Minister reply

    I was almost on point to agree with much of what the right hon. Gentleman said, but unfortunately he ruined it at the end by commenting negatively on university education and degrees. Where we share common cause is making sure all young people have a range of pathways available, including technical training routes through apprenticeships.

  • Chris Vince Lab/Co-op Harlow

    Question

    During National Apprenticeship Week, my right hon. Friend visited Harlow College and agrees that to achieve new homes targets and get people off the streets into those homes, we need to train apprentices now. Does she agree Skills England can be part of this future?

    Minister reply

    I agree with my hon. Friend; he champions opportunities for young people to take on new skills through apprenticeship routes in his constituency and here. Regarding construction, he is right about the fantastic opportunities out there.

  • Toby Perkins Lab Chesterfield

    Question

    Does my right hon. Friend agree that a huge amount of the construction industry is made up of small employers who have been shut out by the apprenticeship levy approach, leading to a 50% reduction in SMEs offering apprenticeships? How will she increase the number of SME apprenticeships?

    Minister reply

    My hon. Friend has raised challenges faced by small businesses and opportunities for creating more apprenticeship starts and training routes. One change during National Apprenticeship Week was to maths and English requirements for adult apprentices, welcomed by business but much more is needed to help smaller employers and contractors take on apprentices.

  • Gareth Snell Lab/Co-op Stoke-on-Trent Central

    Question

    In Stoke-on-Trent, 22% of young people are not in education or training. Can the Secretary of State set out how this Bill will help an organisation such as the Spark Group to tap into opportunities and spread their ability to help young people into well-paid jobs?

    Minister reply

    My hon. Friend names a fantastic business in his constituency contributing significantly. The changes we have made to English and maths will support employers to create 10,000 additional apprenticeships every single year.

  • Tom Hayes Lab Bournemouth East

    Question

    I represent a coastal community that has been neglected for the past 14 years. My constituency's Bournemouth and Poole college is about to open a green energy construction campus in April, teaching solar, heat pump, and rainwater capture skills. Will my right hon. Friend join me in congratulating the college on this initiative?

    Minister reply

    I am delighted to hear my hon. Friend’s experience from Bournemouth. Our colleges are critical for ensuring we have the necessary skills in our economy and driving forward our agenda on clean energy. The campus will enable job growth, training opportunities, and ensure stability and security in our energy supply.

  • Luke Taylor LD Sutton and Cheam

    Question

    I visited South Thames college where I saw labs teaching the installation of heat pumps and other renewable technologies. The main challenge is finding staff to teach these classes and take on apprentices. What support will the Government give colleges for recruiting experienced individuals?

    Minister reply

    The hon. Gentleman is right about the challenges in the further education sector after 14 years of failure under the Conservatives. We have announced an extra £300 million of revenue funding at the Budget, along with new capital investment and retention incentive payments up to £6,000 for early career FE teachers in key subject areas.

  • Perkins Ind

    Question

    The Secretary of State is speaking powerfully about Skills England. While I share her commitment, some believed that putting Skills England on a statutory footing as an independent body might have been better. Why has she taken this approach?

    Minister reply

    We need to act urgently due to chronic skills shortages across the country; delays would hold back growth and opportunities. Skills England will operate independently within the Department for Education, with robust governance and accountability frameworks, a strong chair from business experience, and an independent board chaired by Phil Smith.

  • Gareth Snell Con Constituency not provided

    Question

    How will Skills England support foundational manufacturing industries such as ceramics in Stoke-on-Trent?

    Minister reply

    Skills England will provide more rapid changes to qualifications and training requirements to meet employer needs, including shorter courses and foundation apprenticeships for young people.

  • Perkins Lab Constituency not provided

    Question

    Does the shadow Secretary of State think that IfATE does not have many faults or should it carry on as is?

    Minister reply

    The Bill threatens to undo much of the progress made under successive Conservative Governments in building a world-class apprenticeships and technical education system. The most effective step would be to build on the success of IfATE, rather than dismantling it.

  • Helen Hayes Lab Dulwich and West Norwood

    Question

    How will the further education and skills sector break down barriers for young people?

    Minister reply

    Skills England will empower home-grown talent in all regions so that people have the skills they need for future jobs, addressing the postcode lottery issue by ensuring high-quality opportunities are available everywhere.

  • Ian Sollom LD St Neots and Mid Cambridgeshire

    Question

    While acknowledging the importance of reforming skills delivery, the amendment seeks to decline a Second Reading due to concerns about Skills England's statutory independence and centralised decision-making. It also questions the abolition of the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education without ensuring a legal replacement.

    Minister reply

    The Government acknowledges the need for robust governance but believes that the current framework, while not yet statutory, will ensure effective delivery through its partnership-centric approach. Further clarity on aspects such as accountability and seniority will be addressed in later stages of the Bill.

  • Question

    The hon. Gentleman is making a powerful case for the independence of Skills England. He will know that Government Departments resist independence like most people resist disease, but his point is important because to get the kind of lateral action he describes in respect of the nuclear industry or other industries, it will be necessary for the body created to have a reach that Government Departments do not tend to have.

  • Question

    The implication for standards development is also concerning. Where we have had employer-led trailblazer groups setting standards, the Secretary of State can now bypass employers entirely. In limited circumstances and for minor changes, that will have the benefit of speeding up the review process, which has been frustrating for employers. There are, however, no safeguards to prevent ministerial control becoming the default approach.

  • Perkins Con

    Question

    I see that the hon. Gentleman has received the briefing from the Association of Employment and Learning Providers. He appears to be reading it virtually word for word; I do not know whether he contributed anything to the speech, but it has been very interesting to hear what he has said.

  • Andrew Pakes Lab Peterborough

    Question

    The hon. Member and I share a county, and he will be aware that in a place such as mine, we have seen the decimation of level 2 and 3 apprenticeships. Does he not recognise that the biggest concern I hear from employers is that the current system is centralised and letting down working-class families in seats like mine? What they want is Skills England.

  • Question

    I point out that I represent St Neots, which is not Cambridge, and many employers have spoken to me about their concerns about Skills England and the lack of clarity on its future.

  • No extracted contribution text available for this contributor yet.

  • Luke Murphy Lab Basingstoke

    Question

    The Labour MP criticises the previous government’s performance on apprenticeship starts, noting a 16% drop between 2018-19 and 2023-24. He questions whether the current system can be considered unblemished.

    Minister reply

    Acknowledges the impact of the pandemic but maintains that replacing the existing structure with civil servants might be less effective.

  • Gurinder Singh Josan Lab Smethwick

    Question

    The Labour MP supports the bill's intent to streamline the system and address structural inconsistencies in skills training. He highlights Keltruck Limited’s success in Smethwick, which benefits from a high number of apprenticeships.

    Minister reply

    Emphasises the importance of building in accountability to ensure Parliament can hold Ministers accountable for the new framework.

  • Anna Gelderd Lab South East Cornwall

    Question

    Welcomed the Bill’s commitment to broadening educational opportunities, highlighting the importance of apprenticeships in rural communities like South East Cornwall. She praised local businesses such as Wildanet for their investment in training schemes and emphasised the need to support young people through education.

    Minister reply

    No specific answer provided.

  • John Hayes Con South Holland and The Deepings

    Question

    Discussed the purpose of learning, emphasising that apprenticeships embody the goal of delivering personal fulfilment and fulfilling a social purpose by providing for economic needs.

    Minister reply

    No specific answer provided.

  • Sureena Brackenridge Lab Wolverhampton North East

    Question

    Does the right hon. Member acknowledge the important role that universities play in supporting technical advanced education? Does he also agree that, under the stewardship of the last Government, we saw a decimation of specialist careers guidance in schools?

    Minister reply

    Yes, I acknowledge the role of universities in supporting technical advanced education and agree that specialist careers guidance was affected by previous government policies.

  • Andrew Pakes Lab Peterborough

    Question

    Is he advocating that trade unions should be involved in the new system?

    Minister reply

    Trade unions can play a vital part in ensuring the outcomes that the Government seeks, and I would continue to defend Unionlearn as I did when Minister.

  • John Hayes Con South Holland and The Deepings

    Question

    As I say, I am not an unbridled advocate of the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education, which the Bill abolishes. I did not set it up during my stewardship. As I have already described, I would have preferred a different, guild-based model.

  • Luke Murphy Con Basingstoke

    Question

    Conservative Members are making quite the noise about IfATE’s independence, but I remind the House that this is a precedented move. The Conservative Government established the Standards and Testing Agency, which is currently the Executive agency and was formerly a non-departmental body.

  • Darren Paffey Lab Southampton Itchen

    Question

    I am pleased to see that, with this Bill, the Government are taking action to ensure we get the right framework in place to shape our apprenticeship system.

    Minister reply

    Which hoops is the hon. Gentleman looking forward to the removal of?

  • Leigh Ingham Lab Stafford

    Question

    The Bill underpins the Government’s aim for apprenticeships not to be just for 18-year-olds fresh out of college.

  • Tom Collins Lab Worcester

    Question

    The Bill is an important step towards transforming our education ecosystem to become more agile and responsive. Local colleges are ready to deliver technical and vocational skills needed for transformations in digital, clean energy, and public services. They welcome changes to reduce bureaucracy and want further reviews of apprenticeship standards and funding bands.

  • Andrew Pakes Lab Peterborough

    Question

    It is an honour to follow a passionate speech about apprenticeships but it would be nice to have more Opposition Members in the Chamber for this important debate. The debate has been stuck on the function of a body, rather than the purpose we are trying to achieve.

  • Josh Dean Lab Hertford and Stortford

    Question

    The Bill will allow us to harness the talents of our young people through ambitious skills reform, but apprenticeship starts crashed under the previous Government. The new growth and skills levy will enable employers to access a broader range of higher quality training offers.

  • Dan Aldridge Lab Weston-super-Mare

    Question

    The Bill is about delivering the step change in skills we need if we are to rebuild our communities and country. In towns like Weston-super-Mare, technical education and apprenticeships are fundamental to enterprise, prosperity, and economic independence for young people.

  • Toby Perkins Lab Chesterfield

    Question

    The current system has significant issues such as unspent apprenticeship levy funds, a decline in SME apprentice starts, and low completion rates. What specific measures are being taken to address these problems?

    Minister reply

    We acknowledge the challenges highlighted by the hon. Member for Chesterfield (Toby Perkins) and are committed to addressing them through this bill. By abolishing IfATE and creating Skills England, we aim to streamline processes and ensure more effective use of funds. We will continue to work with employers to identify and implement solutions that enhance the apprenticeship system's effectiveness.

  • Lauren Edwards Lab Rochester and Strood

    Question

    I welcome the Bill, which folds IfATE into Skills England to enable that integrated approach to support our labour market and economy. Can the Minister set out how the Government will ensure that the voices of SMEs will be heard, so that we get an apprenticeship framework that works for all types of businesses?

  • Maya Ellis Lab Ribble Valley

    Question

    One of the best commitments in this Government’s manifesto was to link immigration and skills policy in an effort to tackle the UK’s reliance on international recruitment. What steps will be taken to ensure that the quality and relevance of qualifications is maintained under the new framework?

  • Steve Yemm Lab Mansfield

    Question

    It is vital that the benefits of growth and training are felt equally across our country. The Government’s plan for growth recognises this and plays to our strengths, making us the second most attractive country to invest in globally according to a recent PWC report.

  • Kirith Entwistle Lab Bolton North East

    Question

    Young people are being let down by a skills and training system that does not work for them. The Bill establishes Skills England, which will break barriers that have left entire regions behind.

  • Amanda Martin Lab Portsmouth North

    Question

    The establishment of Skills England is the first step towards improving and promoting vocational pathways by increasing the number of apprenticeships available, improving completion rates, increasing financial support, and enhancing course flexibility.

  • Catherine Atkinson Lab Derby North

    Question

    I am proud to be a Derby MP and to represent a city with incredible engineering, manufacturing and technological expertise and skills. We make things in Derby... Under the previous Government, a third of UK job vacancies were a result of skills shortages, and the uptake of level 4 and 5 technical training in England fell to historically low levels.

  • Antonia Bance Lab Tipton and Wednesbury

    Question

    My hon. Friend is eloquent in setting out the skills challenges of the Black Country. My constituency neighbours hers, and locally 40% of jobs need level 4 skills, but only 16% of people have those skills. That is the challenge we face locally. Does she agree that Skills England should be set up and based in an area of the country that desperately needs a skills upgrade, such as the Black Country?

    Minister reply

    I absolutely welcome that intervention and support it wholeheartedly. Communities such as ours have felt and seen the decline, and the Government are laser focused on reversing that to unlock talent and opportunities, and to give our residents a better chance to get their futures back.

  • Adam Thompson Lab Erewash

    No extracted contribution text available for this contributor yet.

  • Alison Hume Lab Scarborough and Whitby

    Question

    I warmly welcome the Bill. It clearly demonstrates the Government’s ambitious commitment to training and apprenticeships. I will concentrate on the role that Skills England will play in aligning apprenticeship opportunities with the needs of local economies.

  • Amanda Hack Lab North West Leicestershire

    No extracted contribution text available for this contributor yet.

  • Neil O’Brien Con Harborough, Oadby and Wigston

    Question

    Why is the Government reversing the direction on policy regarding apprenticeship length and independence from government?

    Minister reply

    The Minister did not provide a direct answer to this question in the provided text. However, it can be inferred that the Government aims to address current challenges by reforming existing structures and aligning them with contemporary business needs.

  • Question

    In 2011 the last Government set up the Standards and Testing Agency, whose predecessor was a non-departmental public body that became an Executive agency, like IfATE. Why was it okay then but not now?

    Minister reply

    The move from one arms-length body to another in 2011 is different from this reorganisation due to the nature and purpose of these entities. None the less, IfATE was better than either of those things, which is why we ended up there.

  • Question

    How will this new system be directed by the Secretary of State or by Skills England? Will it be set out in guidance?

    Minister reply

    Skills England will simplify the skills system now and in the future, combining new functions with improvements in existing ones. Users of the system can challenge where a standard or assessment plan is not working in practice and needs revising.

  • No extracted contribution text available for this contributor yet.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy