Commons Sense

House of Commons · Adjournment Debate

UK Shared Prosperity Fund

12 September 2024 · 1 other contributor

Opened by Lauren Edwards Lab Rochester and Strood

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Lauren Edwards raised concerns about uk shared prosperity fund in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

Key points

  • The MP highlighted the positive economic and community impacts of the UK Shared Prosperity Fund.
  • The MP proposed a longer six to eight-year funding cycle to address current challenges.
  • The Minister acknowledged the fund's importance and suggested a lighter touch approach to monitoring.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Lauren Edwards Lab Rochester and Strood

The MP sought to address the forthcoming Budget's impact on the UK shared prosperity fund (UKSPF). She highlighted the positive effects of the UKSPF in boosting economic growth, local communities, and regeneration efforts. Drawing from her experience as a former Medway council cabinet member, she detailed how the fund was used to support local community groups, businesses, and charities. Specific examples were given of high street events like the Chatham Chinese New Year Festival which saw significant footfall increases due to UKSPF funding. She also mentioned challenges such as short timescales for planning and single-year funding constraints, proposing a six to eight-year funding cycle as an improvement. The lead MP called for additional flexible revenue funding in next year's Budget to avoid a cliff edge effect at the end of March 2025.

Other contributors (1)
  • Nottingham North and Kimberley Lab Co-op Alex Norris

    The Minister supported the case for extending UKSPF funding and acknowledged its effectiveness in his constituency.

Government Response

The Under-Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government thanked the MP for raising the debate. He acknowledged the importance of the UKSPF in supporting growth and regeneration across the United Kingdom. The Minister agreed on the challenges posed by short funding cycles and proposed a lighter touch approach to monitoring future funds, emphasising local decision-making rather than central restrictions. He stated that while the specific funding decisions are with the Chancellor, the Government is committed to resetting its relationship with local authorities for better outcomes. The Minister expressed interest in working closely with constituents to ensure smooth transitions towards new funding models and promised a more flexible approach to monitoring future initiatives.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy