Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Tribunal and Inquiries

24 May 2024 · 4 other contributors

Opened by Gareth Bacon Con Orpington

ImmigrationJustice & Courts

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Gareth Bacon raised concerns about tribunal and inquiries in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • The statutory instrument is part of the Government's plans to implement the Illegal Migration Act 2023.
  • The Lord Chancellor will make rules instead of the Tribunal Procedure Committee to implement the new appeals regime swiftly.
  • These rules will take effect when the duty to remove under section 2 of the Illegal Migration Act commences.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Gareth Bacon Con Orpington

The statutory instrument forms part of the Government’s preparations for implementing the Illegal Migration Act 2023 and delivers necessary tribunal procedurals. The Lord Chancellor is responsible for making rules instead of the Tribunal Procedure Committee to implement the new appeals regime swiftly, reflecting Parliament's recognition of the importance of rapid implementation. These rules will come into force upon commencement of the duty to remove under section 2 of the Illegal Migration Act.

Other contributors (4)
  • Kevin Brennan

    The statutory instrument governs part of the Prime Minister’s signature immigration legislation, but key clauses are not enacted due to the Government's reluctance. The provisions relate to appeal procedures for removals under the Act, yet no such removals are occurring as the duty to remove has not been enacted. Labour warns against gimmicks and emphasises strengthening border security, tackling criminal gangs, fixing asylum system chaos, and improving enforcement.

  • Kirsty Blackman SNP Aberdeen North

    SNP opposes the UK Government's immigration policies, especially the Rwanda policy. They disagree with decision-making processes and ideology behind these policies. The statutory instrument is part of preparations for the Safety of Rwanda Act 2024, which SNP disagreed with at every stage. They criticise Labour’s rhetoric on small boats crossings and support immigration policies that allow people to contribute to Scotland. SNP will vote against the motion, sticking by their principles.

  • Kevin Brennan Lab Cardiff West

    Apologises for not thanking the Minister earlier and thanks him for his courteous dealings with the Opposition.

  • Bob Neill

    Asks if the Minister will give way on the topic of being nice, indicating that this is a contentious issue but appreciating the Minister's constructive approach towards dealing with difficult legislation.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy