House of Commons · Bill Debate
23 May 2024 · 6 other contributors
Opened by Kevin Hollinrake Con Thirsk and Malton
Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.
Kevin Hollinrake raised concerns about postal services bill - clause 2: meaning of ‘relevant offence’ in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.
Key points
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.
Opened the debate
Minister Kevin Hollinrake moves the amendment, describing it as an historic day for overturning convictions following a significant miscarriage of justice. He acknowledges the support from all parts of both Houses and highlights that the Bill will enable convictions to be overturned upon Royal Assent.
Supports the Bill's aim to exonerate innocent sub-postmasters but calls for assurances on cases from the Capture IT system, compensation commitments by Fujitsu, and seeks progress on including those not covered in the Bill.
Offers a brief interjection to pay tribute to Kevan Jones for his work on behalf of sub-postmasters and expresses disappointment over Scotland's exclusion from the Bill.
Expresses pleasure at the Bill passing, acknowledges Lord Arbuthnot’s support for Scottish cases, and criticises the House's practices regarding witnesses from Scotland.
Pays tribute to those who have fought for justice and thanks key figures like Lord Arbuthnot, Alan Bates, and the Ministers involved. Acknowledges unfinished business regarding Capture cases.
Emphasised the importance of rapid redress for victims affected by the Horizon software scandal. Highlighted the work done by predecessors and colleagues to bring about change, including an independent investigation into the issues with the Capture software used prior to Horizon. Mentioned the planned new scheme for redress payments from July onwards.
Expressed gratitude towards colleagues stepping down, including Paul Scully, Holly Lynch, and Kevan Jones. Acknowledged the profound work done by Kevan Jones on the Horizon scandal and its implications for victims seeking justice and exoneration.