Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism

24 April 2024 · 5 other contributors

Opened by Thomas Tugendhat Con Tonbridge

Crime & Law Enforcement

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Thomas Tugendhat raised concerns about prevention and suppression of terrorism in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • The Government proposes to proscribe the Terrorgram collective under the Terrorism Act 2000.
  • Terrorgram is described as an online network producing violent propaganda to radicalize individuals for terrorism.
  • The group has been linked to the Slovakia attack in October 2022, where a manifesto referenced Terrorgram's publications.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Thomas Tugendhat Con Tonbridge

The Government propose to proscribe the Terrorgram collective, an online network of neo-fascist terrorists that produces and disseminates violent propaganda aimed at radicalizing individuals to commit acts of terrorism. The group has been linked to several terrorist activities worldwide, including the Slovakia attack in October 2022 where a manifesto credited Terrorgram’s publications. The draft order will amend schedule 2 to the Terrorism Act 2000 by adding Terrorgram as a proscribed organisation.

Other contributors (5)
  • Dan Jarvis Lab Barnsley North

    The Opposition supports the proscription of Terrorgram, recognising its threat to national security through online dissemination of violent material. The Labour party acknowledges the innovative approach taken by the Government and highlights the need for a relentless and agile strategy against terrorist groups using digital platforms. Jarvis also raises concerns about violent misogyny not being recognised as an extremist ideology within the Prevent programme.

  • Alison Thewliss SNP Glasgow Central

    Firmly supports the proscription of Terrorgram, recognising its role as an extremist hate-spreading organisation and welcoming the Government's power to compel platforms to remove such content. Also questions whether individuals involved can be proscribed under existing legislation and asks for a review on how people are radicalised online.

  • Jim Shannon DUP Strangford

    Supports the Minister's proscription of Terrorgram, expressing concern over societal radicalism and condemning the organisation's anti-Israel and anti-Jewish propaganda. Urges legislative action against social media platforms used for spreading hate speech.

  • Thomas Tugendhat Con Tonbridge

    Welcomes comments made, emphasises the importance of protecting communities from extremist ideologies, discusses additional funding for community safety and security measures. Also highlights the responsibility of tech companies to combat hate-filled content online.

  • Nigel Evans Con Chorley

    No extracted contribution text available for this contributor yet.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy