Hunting Trophies (Prohibition) Bill - Second Reading of the Bill

He supports the bill, arguing that it has overwhelming public support and should be expedited through both Houses of Parliament. He also emphasises the cross-party nature of the legislation, referencing its bipartisan origins in the previous session.

Intervened to acknowledge the bill's consensus last year and supports its reintroduction. She highlights the broad public support for the measure and the need for swift progress.

Emphasises the strong public support for ending trophy hunting, citing constituents who have contacted him about it. He supports expediting the bill through both Houses.

Argues that the bill will prevent the importation of hunting trophies and send a powerful message to other countries about the immorality of trophy hunting. She highlights public demand for such measures.

Congratulates the bill's introduction and supports it, emphasising that it is humane legislation supported by campaigners in many countries, including Africa. She argues for its swift passage.

Supports the bill and proposes a practical offer to Members of the House of Lords who might oppose it, suggesting an alternative method of wildlife photography instead of trophy hunting.

Supports the bill and mentions that many constituents in her area want this legislation to proceed, highlighting public demand for ending trophy hunting.

Agrees with John Spellar's point that the bill is not partisan but humane and compassionate legislation. He cites Lord Mancroft's statement about socialist legislation as an odd stance for a Conservative government.

Supports the bill, arguing that trophy hunting is not conservation and highlights the brutality of killing endangered animals for trophies. She cites promising figures on tiger populations as evidence against claims that trophy hunting supports conservation.

Argues that trophy hunting is inhumane and does not provide the scientific basis for culling necessary species. He supports the bill as a humane measure.

Supports the bill, citing the negative impact of trophy hunting on gene pools and conservation efforts. He emphasises that taking out the strongest animals weakens the species.

Supports the bill due to public demand and the non-partisan nature of the issue. He mentions his work with FOUR PAWS in advocating against trophy hunting.

Congratulates John Spellar on bringing forward the bill and emphasises public support, citing a survey indicating that nine out of ten British people support the ban. He argues for swift passage through Parliament.

Asked about Clause 4 of the Bill, showing interest in understanding its implications but not explicitly stating a position on the overall bill.

Supports the Bill for its aim to prohibit trophy hunting imports into Great Britain. Cites support from various African countries and dismisses claims of racism or interference in other nations' policies.

Questioned whether the Bill would impact Botswana's President Masisi, who views western interventions as racist. Implies that the Bill could be perceived negatively in Africa.

Affirms that the Bill only addresses imports to the UK, not practices in other countries. Supports the legislation for its focus on what the UK chooses to import.

Reiterates support for the Bill and emphasises that it is about ending the importation of trophies, not regulating practices in other countries. Urges fellow Members to support the legislation.

Describes trophy hunting as an evil practice and argues that it is unjustifiable from both animal welfare and conservation perspectives. Cites support for the Bill from celebrities, activists, and constituents.

The amendment aims to protect certain species while respecting other countries' management of wildlife. Mr Wiggin criticises the Bill's impact on African conservation, citing concerns from African leaders about neo-colonialism and disrespecting local expertise.

Mr Dowd argues that the House has a right to decide against importing hunting trophies, regardless of selective facts. He asserts that enacting legislation banning such imports will not significantly impact African countries.

Honoured the hon. Member for North Herefordshire, but disagreed with his stance; cited David Attenborough's views on trophy hunting; shared personal experience of seeing wildlife in Africa without harming them; emphasised the economic benefits of ecotourism over trophy hunting.

Disagreed with Clive Efford's approach, stating it was prejudiced and unhelpful; argued that amendments proposed by his colleagues in the House of Lords were reasonable but ran out of time for discussion.

Argued against trophy hunting legislation, emphasising the need to ensure no racial undertones in the debate; supported the amendments proposed by his colleagues.

Criticised the Government for not delivering on their manifesto promise to ban trophy hunting; highlighted public support for the Bill; questioned why a Labour peer did not sponsor the previous bill in the House of Lords.

Mr. Chope interjected with an objection during Rebecca Pow's speech, indicating his opposition to the Bill.

Mr. Wiggin verbally objected when the Speaker attempted to proceed with putting the Question, demonstrating his strong opposition to the bill.