Commons Sense

House of Commons · Bill Debate

Offender Notification (Amendment) Bill - Clause 1 - Duty on offenders to notify changes of name and contact details

23 February 2024 · 9 other contributors

Opened by Ruth Jones Lab Newport West

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Ruth Jones raised concerns about offender notification (amendment) bill - clause 1 - duty on offenders to notify changes of name and contact details in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • The Bill will amend the sentencing code to create a duty for offenders to notify their responsible officer of any changes in name or contact details.
  • This includes formal legal changes and the use of online aliases by offenders.
  • The proposal aims to improve public protection and enable swift enforcement actions by probation and youth offending teams.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Ruth Jones Lab Newport West

The Bill will amend the sentencing code to create a duty for offenders sentenced to community orders, suspended sentence orders, youth rehabilitation orders, or referral orders to inform their responsible officer of any changes in name or contact details. This includes formal legal changes and use of online aliases. The proposal aims to ensure consistency across all sentences, improve public protection, and allow swift enforcement actions by probation and youth offending teams. It will also prevent offenders from reoffending under new identities.

Other contributors (9)
  • Supports the Bill as it aligns with the need for effective community rehabilitation and public protection. Highlights the importance of ensuring that non-custodial sentences do not allow offenders to evade rules, reducing reoffending rates.

  • Cherilyn Mackrory Con Truro and Falmouth

    Ms Mackrory supports the Bill, stating that it is crucial for maintaining safety in communities while ensuring appropriate punishments. She highlights concerns about women prisoners having to travel long distances from their families when imprisoned and argues that the Bill allows courts to keep low-level offenders nearer their families, which is beneficial for children and community stability. She also mentions the importance of mental health treatment orders and community payback schemes as effective methods to reduce reoffending rates and reintegrate offenders into society. Additionally, she raises the issue of Clare’s law and asks whether the Bill can help strengthen it by ensuring that domestic violence offenders who do not receive custodial sentences are still tracked.

  • Duncan Baker Con North Norfolk

    Says it is a useful Bill that addresses individuals hiding behind aliases to contact MPs and public officials. Mentions an email case where he encountered someone who had served time, illustrating how people can hide their identities online. Questions if the Probation Service will be able to cope with additional workload. Expresses gratitude towards probation officers, highlighting their hard work and importance.

  • Kevin Brennan Lab Cardiff West

    Supports the Bill presented by his hon. Friend Ruth Jones. Acknowledges the decline in community sentences over recent years, noting that courts and the public need to be reassured about their effectiveness. Emphasises the importance of a functioning probation service for enforcing community orders effectively. Raises concerns about understaffing and underfunding in the probation service.

  • Mike Freer Con Richmond Park

    Argues that the Bill will help reduce reoffending rates by ensuring accurate and timely updates on offenders' details. Emphasises the importance of rigorous community offender management, highlighting that more than half of people given a custodial sentence of less than 12 months reoffend within a year, while those serving suspended sentences have much lower reoffending rates.

  • Ruth Jones Lab Newport West and Islwyn

    Thanked colleagues for their support and highlighted the importance of community sentences over custodial ones, citing a visit to Cardiff Prison where she observed that seven-day sentences are not conducive to rehabilitation. Acknowledged concerns about female prisoners' access to family and the need for proper treatment services.

  • Chris Clarkson Lab Heywood and Middleton

    Suggested that community sentences can be more effective than short custodial sentences in reducing reoffending. Noted that prison does not always work and can make things worse.

  • Cherilyn Mackrory Con Truro and Falmouth

    Discussed challenges in the women’s prison estate, including distance from home as a factor that courts should consider when sentencing. Mentioned Clare's law context.

  • Duncan Baker Con North Norfolk

    Highlighted concerns about aliases and social media usage by offenders, stressing the importance of accurate information for effective monitoring. Emphasised the need for adequate staffing in the probation service.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy