Football Spectators (Unauthorised Entry) Bill - Second Reading of the whole bill

Emphasised that Wembley's purpose-built security should not allow such a breach, highlighting potential loss of life as a stark reality. Supports the Bill to prevent similar incidents.

Supports the intent of the Bill, but questions if it is appropriate to include actions like attempting to enter a car park with the same severity as tailgating into a major match. Also wonders why football alone should be covered when other events face similar issues.

Welcomed the clarification that lower-tier leagues such as Newport County are included, ensuring broad application of safety measures across different levels.

Mr Lord expressed strong support for the Bill, acknowledging its potential to improve safety at sports grounds. He suggested sharing learnings from this legislation with colleagues in Scotland and Northern Ireland if it passes.

Mr Davies supported the Bill but raised concerns about its potential to apply excessively to minor infractions, such as 'cheeky' attempts to gain entry without tickets. He also questioned why the legislation applies only to football and suggested it could be extended to other major sporting events.

Mr Brennan interjected to clarify that courts have discretion not to issue banning orders in cases of minor infractions, such as the 'cheeky' entry attempts described by Mr Davies.

Ms Fletcher supports the Bill, highlighting the risks posed by individuals who try to enter events without tickets. She raises concerns about security staff being put at risk during such incidents. However, she also asks for exceptions and clarifications regarding QR code ticketing systems and accidental breaches of rules due to system failures. Additionally, Ms Fletcher seeks assurances that people like herself who jumped turnstiles due to genuine safety fears will not be criminalised if the Bill passes through Committee stage.

Supports the Bill, praising it for its narrow focus and potential to succeed. Emphasises the importance of balancing deterrence with considerations for unintended consequences and fair treatment. Highlights the cultural significance of football in Britain and the need for proper safeguarding measures. Agrees that the drafting is effective as it does not criminalise minor breaches.

Mr. Tugendhat supports the Bill, emphasising that it addresses important security concerns related to football matches. He notes that while other sports might face similar issues with crowd management, football is uniquely dominant in terms of spectator interest and associated challenges. He commends the hon. Member for Cardiff West's efforts in bringing together Members from across the House and acknowledges the importance of keeping fans safe at events. Mr. Tugendhat also highlights Baroness Casey’s independent review which recommended action against tailgating, among other unauthorised methods of entry to football matches. He stresses that all such attempts draw upon stadium security resources and can result in overcrowding with health and safety risks. The Bill aims to prevent disorder caused by a selfish minority and ensure the safety of football fans.

Summarised the debate, thanked all contributors including hon. Members, civil servants, and staff. Highlighted support from the Culture, Media and Sport Committee and the Football Association of Wales.

Expressed gratitude to Mary and other staff in the Members’ Tea Room for their support. The debate was concluded with a question put and agreed to, committing the bill to a Public Bill Committee.