Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Scottish Law Officers (Devolution)

10 January 2024 · 1 other contributor

Opened by Joanna Cherry SNP Edinburgh Central

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Joanna Cherry raised concerns about scottish law officers (devolution) in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Ms Cherry moved that leave be given to bring in a Bill to amend the Scotland Act 1998
  • She aims to separate the role of the Lord Advocate into two distinct functions
  • Current reservations in the act prevent the Scottish Parliament from amending these roles

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Joanna Cherry SNP Edinburgh Central

Ms Cherry moved that leave be given to bring in a Bill to amend the Scotland Act 1998, emphasising her intention to separate the roles of the Lord Advocate into two distinct functions: one as head of the prosecution service and another as Minister and chief legal adviser. She pointed out current reservations in the act preventing the Scottish Parliament from amending these roles and stressed that reform is overdue, supported by cross-party backing.

Other contributors (1)
  • Joanna Cherry SNP Edinburgh Central

    Ms Cherry argued for the necessity of her Bill to address historical issues in the role of the Lord Advocate, including potential conflicts of interest and perceptions thereof. She highlighted that criminal and civil justice are devolved matters and advocated for Scotland’s Parliament to decide on reforming the Law Officers’ roles, supported by expert research commissioned by the Scottish Government.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy