Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Miners’ Strike (Pardons)

19 December 2023 · 1 other contributor

Opened by Owen Thompson SNP Midlothian

Standards & Ethics

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Owen Thompson raised concerns about miners’ strike (pardons) in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Welcomes the opportunity to discuss pardons for miners wrongfully convicted during the 1984-85 miners' strike.
  • Highlights the Scottish Parliament's passage of a similar law, stressing the need for a UK-wide pardon.
  • Argues that pardons would address past injustices, heal community divisions, and symbolize national unity.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Owen Thompson SNP Midlothian

Welcomes the opportunity to discuss a pardon for miners who were wrongfully convicted during the 1984-85 miners' strike, emphasising the importance of reconciliation and justice. He highlights the Scottish Parliament's passage of a similar law and stresses the need for a UK-wide pardon. The MP argues that the pardons would address past injustices, heal community divisions, and symbolize national unity.

Other contributors (1)
  • Owen Thompson SNP Midlothian

    Calls for a UK-wide pardon to right historical wrongs against miners convicted during the strike. Emphasises the impact of the strikes on communities, highlighting the arbitrary and disproportionate nature of policing tactics used against strikers. Mentions the Scottish Government's independent review and resulting legislation in 2022, urging the UK government to follow suit.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy