Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill - Clause 87 (National development policies: meaning)

Acknowledges that nothing in the Lords message engages Commons financial privilege. Supports Government motion to insist on disagreement to Lords amendment 45 and Government amendment (a) in lieu, appreciating its pragmatism and conciliation.

Supports the original Lords amendment 22, which provides local authorities with discretion. Acknowledges that the amendment in lieu is pragmatic and conciliatory. Emphasises that setting a Bill promoting greater local autonomy, it's 'perverse' for government to dictate how councils conduct themselves.

Supports the Lords amendment 22B, which allows Ministers to determine by regulations the range of circumstances in which hybrid meetings could take place. Argues that it is reasonable and proportionate.

Supports Lords amendment 22 for allowing councils to meet virtually, suggesting it could set a precedent for public sector flexibility and ease the burden on councillors. Acknowledges concerns over NDMPs but welcomes government consultation commitment. Emphasises the need to tackle climate change through planning reforms and calls for the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) to reflect net zero goals.

Expresses disappointment in the House of Lords' lack of amendments protecting devolution and highlights the importance of hybrid meetings for increasing democratic participation. Argues that virtual meetings are crucial for engaging different demographics, especially during challenging circumstances like storms. Stresses the need to take climate change seriously and pass legislation for future generations.

Bailey raised concerns about the potential misuse of virtual meetings by corrupt or incompetent councils, citing his negative experiences with Sandwell Council. He fears that such an amendment could exacerbate legal and governance issues. Despite supporting some underlying aims of the Lords amendments, he opposes this particular mechanism without assurances of Sandwell's disbandment.

Morgan argued for Lords amendment 22B to increase accessibility in local politics, noting the time constraints and travel challenges faced by many councillors. She emphasised that virtual attendance can reduce burdens on councillors who balance their roles with other commitments or live far from council meeting locations. Morgan also supported Lords amendment 45, advocating for climate considerations in planning policies, considering it essential for achieving net zero goals.

She thanks MPs for their contributions, particularly praising those who spoke about inclusivity in local democracy but expresses concern over Lords amendment 22B proposed by Shaun Bailey. She argues that it would allow any future government to permit local authorities to meet virtually at every opportunity, which she believes is too expansive and against the principle of face-to-face local democracy.