Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Same Sex Marriage (Church of England)

21 March 2023 · 2 other contributors

Opened by Ben Bradshaw Lab Exeter

Religion & Faith

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Ben Bradshaw raised concerns about same sex marriage (church of england) in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Speaker moves to bring in a Bill enabling same-sex marriages by Church of England clergy under certain conditions.
  • Speaker notes historical opposition from the Church but mentions changes in public and Anglican support.
  • Speaker criticises the Church's decision to maintain a ban on same-sex marriages after years of discussion.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Ben Bradshaw Lab Exeter

The speaker moves that leave be given to bring in a Bill enabling clergy of the Church of England to conduct same-sex marriages on Church of England premises under certain circumstances. He highlights the historical stance of the Church against civil partnerships and equal marriage, noting changes since then but emphasising ongoing opposition from some quarters. The most recent opinion poll shows majority support among both the public and Anglicans for allowing same-sex weddings in church. The speaker criticises the Church's decision to maintain a ban on such marriages after six years of discussions, arguing that this established institution has a duty to serve all citizens and should adjust its practices as society changes.

Other contributors (2)
  • Ben Bradshaw Lab Exeter

    Discusses the special role played by the Church in times of tragedy and celebration, valuing this but questioning the established status when it is out of step with national opinion on treating LGBT members equally. He references past instances where Parliament nudged the Church to adjust its practices over issues like divorcees and women in leadership roles. The speaker suggests his Bill aims to encourage the bishops to stick to their commitments without forcing them, while emphasising that discussion about the impact is academic given the current lack of legislative chance.

  • Andrew Selous Con Tendring

    Responds to the Bill as Second Church Estates Commissioner, arguing against usurping the role of the General Synod and removing the Church's freedom to decide doctrine. He emphasises that the Synod democratically decided not to change the doctrine of marriage and rejects proposals for same-sex marriage. He asks Parliament to respect the democratic decision of the Synod and argues that directing the Church on doctrine would infringe religious freedom. The Bill is unnecessary as future changes can be made through a Measure. Individual clergy cannot choose actions contrary to Church doctrine, which is centrally decided by the Synod.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy