Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Immigration and Nationality Fees (Exemption for NHS Clinical Staff)

20 March 2023 · 1 other contributor

Opened by Rob Roberts Lab Dulwich and West Norwood

ImmigrationNHS

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Rob Roberts raised concerns about immigration and nationality fees (exemption for nhs clinical staff) in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • The NHS is a crucial part of British society, particularly during the pandemic.
  • NHS workers face fees of over 2,400 for indefinite leave to remain and an additional 1,800 for citizenship.
  • Rob Roberts argues for fee exemptions for NHS staff due to their significant contributions.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Rob Roberts Lab Dulwich and West Norwood

The NHS is a fundamental part of British life, especially during the pandemic. The current requirement for NHS workers to pay over £2,400 for indefinite leave to remain and an additional £1,800 for citizenship is unreasonable. Rob Roberts argues that NHS staff should be exempt from these fees due to their significant contribution to healthcare services in the UK, similar to how veterans are treated.

Other contributors (1)
  • Rob Roberts Lab Dulwich and West Norwood

    The NHS relies heavily on overseas workers who should not be penalised for contributing during a public health crisis. The Government previously exempted veterans from fees, highlighting the potential for similar exemptions for NHS staff. Fees for residency and citizenship discourage foreign workers from joining or staying in the NHS despite their immense value to healthcare services.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy