Commons Sense

House of Commons · Bill Debate

Palestine (Recognition of Statehood) Bill - Clause on recognising the state of Palestine without preconditions

17 March 2023 · 3 other contributors

Opened by Layla Moran Lib Dem Oxford West and Abingdon

Foreign Affairs

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Layla Moran raised concerns about palestine (recognition of statehood) bill - clause on recognising the state of palestine without preconditions in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • The Bill aims to recognise the state of Palestine without any preconditions.
  • It addresses historical issues like the Balfour Declaration and current challenges such as illegal settlements and lack of peace progress.
  • The amendment seeks to provide hope for Palestinians and support their ability to help themselves through diplomatic recognition.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Layla Moran Lib Dem Oxford West and Abingdon

The Bill aims to recognise the state of Palestine without any preconditions. It addresses historical issues, including the Balfour Declaration, and current challenges such as illegal settlements and lack of peace progress. The amendment seeks to provide hope for Palestinians and support their ability to help themselves through diplomatic recognition.

Other contributors (3)
  • Andrew Slaughter Lab Hammersmith and Chiswick

    Supports the idea of recognising Palestine without preconditions, arguing that such recognition should not be part of negotiations. He emphasises the need for equal treatment in defining borders for both Israel and Palestine.

  • Andrew Mitchell Con Sutton Coldfield

    Acknowledges the desire for a sovereign Palestinian state but believes it is not the right time to take this step. Argues that recognising Palestine should be used as a diplomatic tool when it serves peace objectives.

  • Aaron Bell Party Not Mentioned

    Supports the Minister's position, suggesting that Parliament should not dictate diplomatic positions to the Government and advising against circumscribing such decisions.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy