Commons Sense

House of Commons · Adjournment Debate

Pavement Parking

13 March 2023 · 1 other contributor

Opened by Afzal Khan Lab Manchester Rusholme

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Afzal Khan raised concerns about pavement parking in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

Key points

  • Afzal Khan highlighted the daily impact of pavement parking on constituents with disabilities, mobility impairments, and young families in his constituency.
  • The Minister Richard Holden acknowledged widespread concern over pavement parking and noted the Government's inclusive transport strategy aimed at providing equal access to disabled people by 2030.
  • The Minister mentioned ongoing efforts to reform traffic regulation orders and consider civil enforcement options for obstructive parking.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Afzal Khan Lab Manchester Rusholme

Afzal Khan highlighted the daily impact of pavement parking on constituents with disabilities, mobility impairments, and young families. He cited examples from his constituency, including difficulties faced by wheelchair users and new parents navigating parked cars. The MP noted local efforts to tackle the issue but emphasised the need for a national solution, referencing the 2020 consultation and urging the government to expedite its response.

Other contributors (1)
  • The hon. Member fully supports Khan's points about pavement parking obstructing pedestrians and encouraging reckless driving.

Government Response

Minister Richard Holden acknowledged the widespread concern over pavement parking, noting that it impacts constituents across multiple constituencies. He highlighted the Government's inclusive transport strategy aimed at providing equal access to disabled people by 2030 and mentioned investments in cycling and walking infrastructure. The Minister discussed ongoing efforts to reform traffic regulation orders (TROs) and consider civil enforcement options for obstructive parking. He emphasised the need for thorough consideration of all proposals due to their complexity, while committing to expedite reforms and address concerns as soon as practically possible.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy