House of Commons · Bill Debate
01 December 2022 · 2 other contributors
Opened by Alex Burghart Con Brentwood and Ongar
Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.
Alex Burghart raised concerns about the counsellors of state bill - clause 1 in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.
Key points
Key requests to Government
Bill passed without amendment
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.
Opened the debate
This clause provides for the Earl of Wessex and Princess Royal to serve as Counsellors of State during their lifetimes, subject to provisos set out in the 1937 Act. The purpose is to ensure that royal functions can be delegated properly when required, maintaining the continuity of the monarchy's role in governance. This Bill reflects the enduring importance of the monarchy and its adaptation to modern times while preserving constitutional traditions.
The House recognised the affection for the royals and their contributions. The swift passage of this Bill demonstrates that when there is consensus, Parliament can act swiftly and responsibly.
Acknowledged the speed and unanimity of the Bill's passage. Provided a brief historical correction on when the kingdom began, emphasising the importance of accurate information in debates.