Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Parliamentary Works Sponsor Body

01 December 2022 · 2 other contributors

Opened by Barry Sheerman Lab Huddersfield

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Barry Sheerman raised concerns about parliamentary works sponsor body in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Concerns were raised about the Sponsor Body ensuring the use of the River Thames for construction related to the restoration and renewal of the Parliamentary Estate.
  • The specific asks of the government regarding this matter were not recorded.
  • No commitments were made by the government in response to these concerns.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Barry Sheerman Lab Huddersfield

Questioned whether the Sponsor Body is taking steps to ensure that construction related to restoration and renewal of the Parliamentary Estate will make use of the River Thames.

Other contributors (2)
  • Edward Leigh Con Gainsborough

    Responded that the restoration and renewal programme is considering innovative methods, including making use of river access. The delivery authority is already undertaking feasibility studies on how to make more use of the river.

  • Emphasised the opportunity for a Thames renaissance through increased traffic and its role as the main concourse of London, both for Parliament and the new holocaust memorial building.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy