Commons Sense

House of Commons · Bill Debate

The Energy Profits Levy Bill - Clause 1

11 July 2022 · 14 other contributors

Opened by Simon Clarke Con Newton Abbot

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Simon Clarke raised concerns about the energy profits levy bill - clause 1 in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Moves the Energy Profits Levy to a temporary 25% surcharge on extraordinary profits from oil and gas extraction.
  • Aims to raise approximately 5 billion over 12 months to support vulnerable households during high inflation.
  • Includes an investment allowance that nearly doubles the tax relief available to encourage firm investment.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Simon Clarke Con Newton Abbot

Moves the Energy Profits Levy, a temporary 25% surcharge on extraordinary profits from oil and gas extraction to fund cost of living support for UK families. The levy aims to tax unexpected profits fairly while incentivising investment in the North Sea's energy security and net zero transition. It includes an investment allowance that nearly doubles the tax relief available, encouraging firms to invest more. The Bill will raise approximately £5 billion over 12 months, targeting funds towards supporting vulnerable households during high inflation.

Other contributors (14)
  • Stephen Flynn SNP Aberdeen South

    Asked for clarity on what the Government regards as normal oil and gas prices, emphasising the need to define this threshold clearly to encourage industry investment. He questioned why such specifics were not included in the Bill text.

  • Alan Brown SNP Clydebank and Milport

    Asked for additional clarity on how the Government defines normal prices, echoing concerns about investment certainty without a clear price threshold.

  • James Murray Lab Co-op Ealing North

    Supports the amendment, citing soaring profits of oil producers amid a cost-of-living crisis and arguing that it is fair to levy a windfall tax. Criticises the delay in implementing such measures and highlights potential loopholes like multiple home payments for £400 support funds.

  • Alan Brown SNP Kilmarnock and Loudoun

    Intervenes to question why Labour is not looking at a wider profits levy on companies like Tesco, which have also seen significant profit increases during the pandemic.

  • Andrew Bowie Con West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine

    Argues against the amendment, stating that it would harm successful British industries like oil and gas. He questions Labour's commitment to those employed in these sectors.

  • Peter Aldous Con Waveney

    Proposes a levy that aims to support people in the cost of living crisis but also seeks balance for long-term investment. Argues against poorly drafted levies as they could stifle growth and job creation, especially for SMEs and decarbonisation projects.

  • Stephen Flynn SNP Aberdeen South

    Supports the principles of the levy but criticises the Government's lack of certainty regarding oil price thresholds for lifting the levy and the absence of incentives for renewable technologies. Also highlights the need for climate change considerations.

  • Nigel Evans Party Unspecified Constituency Unspecified

    Congratulates the hon. Member for Wakefield on delivering his maiden speech.

  • Wera Hobhouse Lib Dem Bath

    Supports a windfall tax on oil and gas companies but criticises the Government's delayed response. She argues for backdating the levy to last October, stating that more could have been raised if action had been taken earlier. Hobhouse also questions the exemption of companies investing in new exploration and calls for greater incentives for renewable energy investment.

  • Stephen Flynn SNP Aberdeen South

    Asked about when Labour's shadow Ministers last met industry representatives in Aberdeen to discuss their views on the windfall tax bill.

  • Alan Brown Unidentified Constituency and Party

    Requested an intervention but did not make a statement within the provided text.

  • Lucy Frazer Con South East Cambridgeshire

    The Government is introducing a temporary, targeted levy to fund cost of living support and encourage companies to invest. The levy will raise £5 billion compared to Labour's proposal of £1.2 billion. Industry representatives have welcomed the investment allowance included in the levy as it makes domestic oil and gas projects more attractive for companies extracting oil and gas in the UK.

  • Alan Brown SNP Central Ayrshire

    Asked for clarity on what 'reserve' means regarding the Scottish carbon capture infrastructure cluster, questioning whether it is a tactic to keep the industry in reserve or if it implies that one of the selected projects might fail.

  • Stephen Flynn SNP Aberdeen South

    Asked for confirmation on whether the levy would cease if oil prices fall to around $60 or $70 a barrel, seeking clarity on how this affects industry and investment.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy