Commons Sense

House of Commons · Adjournment Debate

Dangerous Dogs

07 July 2022 · 1 other contributor

Opened by Wayne David Lab Caerphilly

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Wayne David raised concerns about dangerous dogs in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

Key points

  • Concerns raised about the leniency of sentences given to defendants in a case where a boy was killed by a dangerous dog, prompting calls for reforms to the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991.
  • The hon. MP stresses the need for preventive measures and revised sentencing guidelines to address irresponsible dog ownership effectively.
  • The Minister highlights ongoing efforts to promote responsible dog ownership, including a Middlesex University report and a responsible dog ownership project focusing on various preventive measures.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Wayne David Lab Caerphilly

In November, a 10-year-old boy named Jack Lis was tragically killed by a dangerous dog in Penyrheol. The dog, an American XL Bully called Beast, was bought on the internet only days before and had exhibited aggressive behaviour previously. One defendant received a three-year sentence while the other got four and a half years, both found guilty of keeping or allowing a dog dangerously out of control where death occurred. However, these sentences are deemed too lenient by Jack's mother, Emma, and the local community. The hon. MP raises concerns about the lack of power to refer such cases to the Court of Appeal for review under current legislation, calling for an addition to the scheme by the Secretary of State for Justice. He also emphasises the need for revised sentencing guidelines and a fundamental rethink of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, advocating for preventive measures instead of reactive approaches like breed-specific bans. Statistics highlight the frequency of dog attacks, stressing the inadequacy of existing legislation and the importance of comprehensive reform to protect public safety.

Other contributors (1)
  • Heather Wheeler Con Stoke-on-Trent South

    Commends Wayne David for raising this issue and acknowledges his diligence in campaigning against dangerous dogs. She extends condolences to the Lis family, noting that sentences are decided by courts based on evidence.

Government Response

The Minister conveys her sympathies to the Lis family for their loss and assures the House of Commons' commitment to address irresponsible dog ownership. She outlines actions taken, including a Middlesex University report on reducing dog attacks and promoting responsible ownership across all breeds. A responsible dog ownership project is underway with sub-groups examining data collection practices, licensing requirements, enforcement, training courses, and education initiatives for children. The project aims to conclude next year, after which the Government will consider advice for future steps. She also mentions a rapid response involving stakeholders, police, local authorities, and devolved Administrations to develop simple safety messages about dog interactions with children. The Minister stresses the need to balance views on breed-specific legislation with public safety concerns while exploring current legislation's effectiveness and areas for improvement as part of ongoing work.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy