House of Commons · General Debate
Select Committees and Contempts
16 June 2022 · 2 other contributors
Opened by Bernard Jenkin Con Harwich and North Essex
Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.
At a glance
Bernard Jenkin raised concerns about select committees and contempts in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.
Key points
- Concerns were raised during the debate
- Specific asks of the government were not recorded
- No commitments were made during the debate
How the debate unfolded
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.
Other contributors (2)
-
The report discusses the need for legislation to address recalcitrant witnesses who refuse to comply with Select Committee summons. It reaffirms that a criminal offence of refusing to attend or provide papers is necessary, revising initial proposals to include a maximum sentence of six months' imprisonment and giving Mr Speaker the power to issue statutory summons. The report also clarifies that the proposed legislation does not seek to criminalise contempts but rather non-compliance with summonses without reasonable excuse.
-
The Opposition welcomes the Committee's report and recommendations, highlighting the essential role of Select Committees in holding the Government accountable. Questions whether there is a preferred timetable for potential legislation to be brought forward.