Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Business of the House (private members’ Bills)

13 June 2022 · 1 other contributor

Opened by Peter Bone Con Wellingborough

Parliamentary Procedure

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Peter Bone raised concerns about business of the house (private members’ bills) in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Concern was raised about the scheduling of private Members' Bill days, suggesting they are back-loaded and may limit bill progression time.
  • Emphasis was placed on the significance of private Members' Bills as a legislative tool for non-Government members.
  • A request was made for the Leader of the House to reconsider the dates allocated for these bills.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Peter Bone Con Wellingborough

Expressed concern over the scheduling of private Members' Bill days, noting that they are back-loaded and may not provide sufficient time for bills to progress through both Houses. He emphasised the importance of these bills as a means for non-Government members to introduce legislation and asked the Leader of the House to reconsider the dates listed.

Other contributors (1)
  • Mark Spencer Con Sherwood

    Responded positively to the debate, highlighting the success in passing private Members' Bills despite challenges posed by covid. He encouraged optimism and collaboration with the Whips Office while addressing concerns about the scheduling.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy