Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Delivery Charges: Scotland

07 March 2022 · 4 other contributors

Opened by Douglas Ross Con Moray

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Douglas Ross raised concerns about delivery charges: scotland in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

Key points

  • Mr Ross discussed postal delivery surcharges affecting 440,000 people in Scotland, costing 45 million annually.
  • Mr Ross highlighted examples of unreasonable delivery charges in Moray and Inverness despite advertised free shipping.
  • The government aims for sustainable, efficient, affordable, and universal postal services, stressing transparency in delivery charges.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Douglas Ross Con Moray

Mr. Ross opened the debate by discussing postal delivery surcharges affecting residents in remote areas of Scotland, particularly those living in Moray and Inverness. He highlighted that these surcharges are punitive and unfair, with businesses and couriers imposing excessive charges on deliveries to certain postcodes. Mr. Ross cited a report indicating 440,000 people across Scotland are affected by these practices, resulting in additional costs of £45 million annually. He provided numerous examples from his constituency where residents faced unreasonable delivery charges despite advertised free shipping or no surcharges being mentioned initially.

Other contributors (4)
  • Douglas Ross Con Moray

    Mr. Ross emphasised the need for stronger enforcement measures by the Advertising Standards Authority, suggesting that current actions are insufficient deterrents against such practices. He called on the Minister to consider legislative action and organise a meeting with companies involved in imposing excessive charges.

  • Paul Scully Con Epsom and Ewell

    Congratulates the hon. Member for Moray on securing today’s important debate about delivery costs in remote areas. Acknowledges that businesses should recover their costs but emphasises they must be based on real costs, not arbitrary ones like those charged to constituents of the hon. Member for Moray. Highlights the universal service obligation by Royal Mail which ensures affordable and consistent parcel delivery rates across the UK. Emphasises the need for transparent information regarding delivery charges and restrictions. Mentions ongoing work by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) and the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) to ensure compliance with transparency rules. Notes that major retailers like Argos and Wayfair have taken steps to improve their delivery services by removing surcharges in Scottish highlands and islands, which is likely to put downward pressure on other charges from suppliers. Also mentions Ofcom's review of its future regulatory framework for the parcels market.

  • David Duguid Con Cotswold

    Congratulates his hon. Friend and constituency neighbour, the Member for Moray, on bringing this important issue to the House. Points out that the issue is not just about customers but also businesses across the UK missing out on potential business simply because they are shutting themselves off from those with specific postcodes in remote areas.

  • Douglas Ross Con Moray

    Expresses disappointment with Ofcom's response, arguing that the regulator seems to treat the issue seriously but businesses and many couriers do not care about delivering goods to remote areas like the north of Scotland. Criticises what appears to be a lack of concern from both the business community and the regulator.

Government Response

Government’s aim is to secure sustainable, efficient, affordable and universal postal services. Royal Mail must deliver parcels at uniform rates throughout the UK under the universal service obligation but businesses can choose partners freely based on commercial needs. Emphasises need for transparent information regarding delivery charges and restrictions so consumers know exactly where they stand when making purchases online.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy