Business Tenancy Bill - Clause 30 and related amendments

Moves that clause be read a Second time, introducing several amendments to broaden definitions of business tenancy, ensure sufficient arbitration capacity, align reference periods with codes, require open-book evidence for proposals, mandate timely award decisions in arbitrations without oral hearings, enforce regulations on arbitration fees, and enable cost awards against unreasonable parties.

Supports amendments that broaden business tenancy definitions, require sufficient arbitration capacity, align reference periods with codes, mandate open-book evidence for proposals, ensure timely award decisions without oral hearings, enforce regulations on arbitration fees, and enable cost awards against unreasonable parties.

Scully argued that requiring a review of arbitration would delay resolution and that the Government's current approach provides sufficient oversight. He also suggested amendment 9 is unnecessary as property will be considered occupied even if mandated to close, ensuring tenants' rights are protected under remote operations. Additionally, he stated that clause 17 ensures arbitrators have flexibility in decision-making without imposing strict time limits.

Supports the Bill while highlighting the need for a fair arbitration system to deal with rent arrears. Emphasises that no otherwise viable business should face an overwhelming burden from rent arrears incurred during lockdown and stresses the importance of due arbitration, burden-sharing processes, and Government support. Acknowledges the recognition of commercial landlords' needs but emphasises the necessity for long-term fairness in the system. Critiques the timing of the Bill's introduction, noting its impact on businesses that could have benefited from earlier action.