Commons Sense

House of Commons · Adjournment Debate

Vulnerable Asylum Seeker Services: Stockton

09 December 2021 · 1 other contributor

Opened by Alex Cunningham Lab Stockton North

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Alex Cunningham raised concerns about vulnerable asylum seeker services: stockton in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

Key points

  • Alex Cunningham highlighted inadequacies in the asylum accommodation system run by private contractors, leading to poor conditions for vulnerable women and children.
  • Cunningham cited a backlog of 67,547 people waiting for initial decisions and over 125,000 facing removal or further decision-making processes.
  • The MP criticised the Home Office's criteria for approving unsuitable accommodation and called for improved checks and accountability.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Alex Cunningham Lab Stockton North

Alex Cunningham highlighted the inadequacies in the asylum accommodation system run by private contractors, causing prolonged delays and poor conditions for vulnerable women and children seeking sanctuary. He cited a record-high backlog of 67,547 people waiting for initial decisions on their claims and over 125,000 facing removal or further decision-making processes. The MP emphasised the lack of oversight from the Home Office leading to reliance on contingency accommodation such as hotels and hostels, which are unsuitable and detrimental to residents' health and well-being. Cunningham detailed specific instances in Stockton where pregnant women and children were accommodated in substandard conditions without proper facilities, adequate food, or opportunities for social interaction. He criticised the Home Office's criteria for approving such accommodations and called for improved checks on providers, transparency, and accountability. The MP also addressed concerns over funding allocated to dispersal areas and advocated for direct support to local authorities taking in new arrivals. Cunningham further discussed the need for significant investment in improvements to the current stock of dispersal housing and urged a review of criteria approving accommodations to prevent such poor conditions from being replicated.

Other contributors (1)
  • John Howell Con Henley

    John Howell agreed with Cunningham's points on the importance of ensuring asylum seekers are housed appropriately.

Government Response

Kevin Foster acknowledged the challenges in the current asylum accommodation system and emphasised the UK’s commitment to helping those fleeing persecution. He highlighted the increase in demand due to the pandemic and illegal crossings, leading to a significant rise in asylum seeker numbers. The Minister committed to improving the fairness and efficacy of the immigration system while addressing immediate statutory needs. Foster detailed efforts to exit contingency hotel accommodation through increased dispersed housing options with local authorities' support and reviewed criteria for approving accommodations. He praised Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council's collaboration and announced plans to mandate all local authorities in the national transfer scheme for unaccompanied asylum-seeking children, aiming to end reliance on hotels. The Minister reassured the House of meeting statutory obligations towards destitute asylum seekers, including provision of essential living needs, cash allowances, and access to Migrant Help for issue reporting. He committed to reviewing feedback from Members of Parliament regarding service performance issues and thanked community organisations in Stockton for their support.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy