Digital Economy Bill - Clause 1 (Music Streaming Regulations)

Mr. Mike Wood questioned whether someone who sold a million copies of a single in the 1990s saw their work reach the top 25 singles list annually, contrasting it with the fact that over 1,700 different artists had more than one million streams last year. He argued that streaming music is shared much more widely now, suggesting that many artists are receiving less exposure as a result.

Mr. Greg Knight declared an interest similar to another hon. Member on a modest scale and suggested that, regardless of one's view on the Digital Economy Bill, there are issues needing attention. He proposed putting the bill into committee where it can be scrutinised in detail and amended as necessary.

Mr. George Freeman asked on what basis he thinks the government is resisting a particular proposal, indicating that the issue might be complex and requiring further discussion.

Mr Russell expressed his support for the principles of the bill, celebrating and supporting artists in the UK. However, he raised concerns about the potential risks to digital innovation and the impact on independent musicians and film soundtracks. He emphasised the importance of engaging with all parties before enacting legislation.

Asked the Deputy Speaker if a speech was in order, questioning its relevance to the Bill.

Acknowledged the point of order and emphasised the importance of relevance. Supported the Bill, noting it focuses on remuneration for musicians.

Responded to criticism about major corporations' claims by pointing out a reduction in market share of UK artists over recent years. Emphasised the need for balance and understanding of system dynamics.

Asked about the promoter's suggestion to pursue issues in Committee and whether it fits within the current Session timetable, questioning if the engagement exercise announced by the Government is a 12-month process.

Appreciated the opportunity to speak on the Bill and emphasised its importance for fair remuneration. Highlighted the impact of streaming on musicians' earnings, expressing concern about fairness in the music industry system. Called for clearer understanding through equitable remuneration and contract adjustment measures.

Clarified that although Lucian Grainge relocated to Los Angeles, he remains a British citizen with ties to the UK music industry.

Asked Julie Elliott about practical implications of an artist giving notice under the Bill, inquiring how it would affect other artists on the same track.

Pays tribute to Kevin Brennan for raising musicians' rights. Acknowledges streaming's positive impact on music industry but highlights power imbalance issues between artists, record companies and publishers. Calls for transparency, direct representation of artists in remuneration discussions, treating streams as licences rather than sales, improving breakage rules, and ensuring proper auditing and disclosure practices.

Supports Esther McVey's speech but questions the proposal to change funding models. Suggests current model works by investing in many artists, though not all will succeed, and warns against breaking this system which could harm future British artists.

Supports the Second Reading of the Bill which aims to address unfairness in how remuneration systems treat musicians for their work on streaming platforms. Highlights historical exploitation by record labels, current economic challenges due to the pandemic affecting artists' livelihoods, and the need for modernisation of legal frameworks to reflect changes in consumption patterns. Emphasises the imbalance where 55% of streaming income ends up with record labels while only 15% goes to artists. Supports the Bill's proposals as an important step forward towards fairer remuneration for musicians.

The hon. Member for Gower argues that while he supports action on many themes raised by the Bill, it could have unintended consequences and harm future investment in British music. He highlights improvements in artist remuneration and terms in recent years and emphasises the need for a data-driven approach before any legislative changes.

Cited the IPO’s report indicating that since 2015, the market has become more fragmented with an increase in artists gaining streams. This suggests a positive diversification of income among musicians despite the lower per-stream payments.

Argued that 1 million streams equate to substantial income, equivalent to over a thousand CD sales. He highlighted the limited financial gains from CDs and suggested that streaming mirrors this limitation.

Asked for assurance from the Minister regarding the Government’s commitment to addressing musician's concerns and ensuring action on the issue.

Advocated that the Bill should have a chance to proceed into Committee for further amendments. Emphasised the need for flexible adjustments in the legislative process.

Expressed concern about Spotify's role and called for a commitment to fair relationships, beyond mere exposure.

Asked the Government to consider the value gap issue and ensure that concerns about YouTube versus other streaming services are addressed in future measures.

Pressed the Minister for a specific timeframe for taking action on musician's rights, expressing frustration over the delay.

Suggests that while ensuring artists are paid more is important, equitable remuneration could harm music labels' ability to invest in new talent and reduce opportunities for emerging musicians. He warns it may also make Britain's music industry less competitive globally.

Supports the Bill, noting that it aims to address unfairness and lack of transparency in the music industry. Acknowledges government support but calls for further action to ensure fair rights and income distribution for artists.

Mr. Longhi expressed concerns about rushing into legislation that could have far-reaching unintended consequences for the UK's music industry, which plays a crucial role in job creation and growth at home and abroad. He urged caution and gathering further evidence to inform better policy choices.

Mrs. Crosbie supported the Bill's aim of equitable remuneration, citing its importance in protecting musicians from exploitation and ensuring fair compensation for performances in public venues such as hotels and radio stations.

Ms. Richardson highlighted the personal significance of music in her life and expressed support for the Bill's aim to ensure creatives can make a living from their work. However, she also raised concerns about the potential impact on independent small and medium-sized businesses like Lockjaw Records.