Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Acquired Brain Injury Bill

03 December 2021 · 2 other contributors

Opened by Chris Bryant Lab Rhondda and Ogmore

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Chris Bryant raised concerns about acquired brain injury bill in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Concerns raised about the necessity of the Acquired Brain Injury Bill were expressed by the proposer
  • The proposer stated that the Government was already planning to have a strategy on acquired brain injury
  • The proposer decided not to proceed with the Bill as there was no longer a perceived need for it

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Chris Bryant Lab Rhondda and Ogmore

My Bill was only going to force the Government to have a strategy on acquired brain injury. As the Government are going to have such a strategy, and I am very fond of the Minister who is going to be co-chairing a panel that is being set up, there does not seem any need for the legislation, so I am not going to move it.

Other contributors (2)
  • Chris Bryant Lab Rhondda and Ogmore

    My Bill was only going to force the Government to have a strategy on acquired brain injury. As the Government are going to have such a strategy, and I am very fond of the Minister who is going to be co-chairing a panel that is being set up, there does not seem any need for the legislation, so I am not going to move it.

  • I was incredibly generous; Christmas is coming and that was your early gift, Mr Bryant.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy