Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism

The Government are committed to protecting the public by proscribing Hamas in its entirety. The decision reflects a no-contact policy with Hamas, aligning with EU sanctions and reflecting an assessment of the terrorist threat level which was raised from substantial to severe on November 15th.

The speaker questions whether the distinction between military and political wings of Hamas is accurate given recent events, such as the murder of an Israeli tour guide by a member of Hamas’s political wing in Jerusalem. He suggests that proscribing Hamas entirely sends a clear message to extremists who reject Israel's existence.

The Opposition agrees with the motion to proscribe Hamas fully, highlighting the need for balance in applying the proscription test under the Terrorism Act 2000. He raises concerns about transparency in decision-making processes and the impact of proscription on peace talks and NGO activities in Palestine.

Congratulates the Minister on his appointment and supports the decision to proscribe Hamas in its entirety. Emphasises that this move is necessary due to recent terrorist incidents, such as the murder of Eli Kay and the incident in Liverpool. Highlights that the distinction between political and military wings of Hamas has been artificial for a long time, similar to Hezbollah's case. Acknowledges support from allies around the world, including Gulf states, and emphasises the need to treat organisations like Hamas as terrorist entities based on their extremist ideologies.

The SNP supports a just peace in the Middle East based on dialogue and international law. Alyn Smith expresses unease about the proposal to proscribe all of Hamas, citing concerns over timing, process, and implications. He highlights that recently there was recognition of a distinction between Hamas’s military and political wings but now this line is being changed without clear reasons or significant changes in circumstances. Smith questions the lack of engagement with allies and humanitarian NGOs before the decision. He also raises concerns about how proscribing Hamas will impact NGOs working on peace, reconciliation, and aid delivery in Gaza.

Philippa Whitford intervened to express her concern that the proposed listing of Hamas could have a chilling effect on small education and healthcare NGOs working in Gaza. She mentioned personal experience running a breast cancer project between Scotland and Gaza, highlighting how unavoidable it is for such projects to involve the Ministry of Health which may be influenced by Hamas.

He argues against the proscription, stating that it will have a chilling effect on humanitarian aid to Gaza. He believes in understanding political Islamists' perspectives to draw them away from violence.

Supports the proscription of Hamas but raises concerns about lack of consultation with organisations engaged in conflict resolution and humanitarian work, such as IDEALS. Requests a commitment that aid agencies will not be inadvertently impacted by this designation.

Supports the Government's decision to proscribe Hamas, appreciates the Opposition’s sensible approach, and addresses points raised by other Members. Emphasises the importance of humanitarian support for Gaza while recognising Hamas as a terrorist organisation.

Supports the measure because the political wing of Hamas supports its military operations, but emphasises that indiscriminate violence is unacceptable. Highlights the lack of a peace process and draws parallels with Northern Ireland's progress towards peace through courageous leadership. Raises concerns about medical and humanitarian work in Gaza and organisations like Forward Thinking, asking if NHS staff will be able to continue their work without fear of prosecution.

Agrees the Government should combat terrorism and antisemitism but expresses concerns about criminalising those who work towards peace building. Highlights issues with charities working on peace efforts feeling criminalised overnight due to lack of consultation by Home Office. Requests meetings between charities and the Home Office, and asks for exemptions for British-based charities involved in dialogue and peacebuilding.

No extracted contribution text available for this contributor yet.

Welcomed the Home Secretary’s decision to fully proscribe Hamas, arguing that it is long overdue. Criticised Hamas for its charter and actions in Gaza since 2006, highlighting its responsibility for four major conflicts, over 6,000 civilian deaths, and countless war crimes. Stressed that supporting terrorism is wrong and called on the media to properly record Hamas’s designation as a terror organisation.

Confirmed that the proscription of Hamas would be extended to cover the entire organisation. Emphasised the rigour of the process and the ongoing review of the list of proscribed organisations, mentioning recent additions such as Sonnenkrieg Division and Feuerkrieg Division. Addressed questions about consultation and timing, stating that proscription is an executive tool based on security assessments. Reassured NGOs and charities that they can continue their work while complying with terrorism legislation.