House of Commons · General Debate

Miscellaneous

18 November 2021 · 1 other contributor

Opened by Peter Grant SNP Glenrothes

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Peter Grant raised concerns about miscellaneous in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

Mr Grant criticises the timetable of the Financial Services Amendment Bill for limiting proper scrutiny.
Mr Grant mentions a difference in opinion on clause 2 of the bill.
Mr Grant suggests a Public Bill Committee could provide an informed decision with expert witnesses.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Peter Grant SNP Glenrothes

Mr. Grant does not intend to oppose the motion but criticises the timetable of the Financial Services (Amendment) Bill, arguing that it limits proper scrutiny. He mentions a difference in opinion on clause 2 and suggests that a Public Bill Committee could provide an informed decision with expert witnesses' input.

Other contributors (1)

John Glen Con Salisbury

Mr. Glen acknowledges the concerns raised by Mr. Grant and provides context for the unusual procedure, stating that this Bill is consequential on the Financial Services Act 2021 and will receive full scrutiny through a Committee of the whole House.