Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Parliamentary Works Sponsor Body

22 September 2021 · 3 other contributors

Opened by Jacob Rees-Mogg Con North East Somerset

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Jacob Rees-Mogg raised concerns about parliamentary works sponsor body in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Proposes the appointment of Sir Edward Leigh and Paul Lewis to the Parliamentary Works Sponsor Body.
  • Praises Sir Edward Leigh and Paul Lewis for their expertise in construction and architecture.
  • Praises Sir Edward Leigh and Paul Lewis for their experience in public spending scrutiny.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Jacob Rees-Mogg Con North East Somerset

Proposes the appointment of Sir Edward Leigh as a parliamentary member and Paul Lewis as an external member to the Parliamentary Works Sponsor Body under the Parliamentary Buildings (Restoration and Renewal) Act 2019. He praises both candidates for their expertise in construction, architecture, and public spending scrutiny.

Other contributors (3)
  • Thangam Debbonaire Lab Bristol West

    Supports the appointments but urges for cost-effective long-term planning, emphasising that Members should apply a keen eye to public spending. She recommends reading 'Mr Barry’s War' and warns against politicians meddling in areas they are not qualified for. Emphasises the need for urgency and full decant.

  • Kirsty Blackman SNP Aberdeen North

    Acknowledges the outgoing member's work, welcomes new members, and expresses concerns about governance structures that could lead to conflicting instructions. She supports full decant but is sceptical of the current governance setup.

  • Mark Tami Lab Alyn and Deeside

    Thanked Damian Hinds for his work, welcomed new members to the board, criticised the Leader of the House for delaying action on parliamentary estate issues. Emphasised that ignoring the problem costs money and affects buildings such as Portcullis House, Norman Shaw South and Parliament Street building. Stressed the need to ensure a fit-for-purpose Parliament for future centuries.

▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy