Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministerial Statement

Loss of Secret Documents

28 June 2021 · 26 other contributors

Opened by Jeremy Quin Con Constituency

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Jeremy Quin raised concerns about loss of secret documents in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

Key points

  • A senior official from the Ministry of Defence lost classified documents marked "Secret UK Eyes Only".
  • The incident was self-reported on Tuesday 22 June.
  • A member of the public found the papers at a bus stop in Kent and handed them to the BBC.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Government Statement

A senior official from the Ministry of Defence lost classified documents early last week, which included a paper marked “Secret UK Eyes Only”. The incident was self-reported on Tuesday 22 June. A member of the public found these papers at a bus stop in Kent and handed them to the BBC. The MOD launched an investigation into the actions of individuals involved and underlying processes for printing and carriage of papers within Defence. Access to sensitive material for the individual responsible has been suspended until further notice, while the findings remain confidential pending completion of the investigation.

Other contributors (26)
  • John Healey Lab Rawmarsh and Conisbrough

    Question

    Asked about involvement of military police in this incident, when the investigation will report, if findings will be published. Also questioned on level of classification of documents found at bus stop, whether espionage has been ruled out, if allies were informed immediately, and impact on morale of armed forces.

    Minister reply

    MOD police are involved as part of the investigation. Timing for report is hoped to be in very short order (possibly a week), but cannot commit due to potential further findings. Official classification of documents is “UK Eyes Only”. Espionage not ruled out but individual self-reported loss. Allies informed, specifically the US. Emphasised importance of providing good support and back-up to armed forces.

  • Julian Lewis Con New Forest East

    Question

    Asked if any official secrets legislation was broken by handing documents to BBC or by selective quoting from classified information, whether Government will inquire about payment for acquisition of these documents.

    Minister reply

    Documents should ideally be handed over to police upon finding; preferred immediate handover but recognises BBC's responsible handling and returning of documents.

  • Question

    Concerned about context of discovery, mentions decline in public standards, worries about morale and trust in public life.

    Minister reply

    Admits incident is a mistake; investigation thorough to ensure such mistakes do not happen again. Acknowledges concerns about confidence in procedures.

  • Mark Pritchard Con The Wrekin

    Question

    Asked when Government will introduce reform of Official Secrets Act, particularly on classification and punishment for breaches.

    Minister reply

    Reform being looked into by the Government but not directly part of MOD's responsibility.

  • Jamie Stone Lib Dem Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross

    Question

    Concerned about impact on morale of armed forces, hope that inquiry will pick up exactly what happened.

    Minister reply

    Agrees with importance of confidence in procedures for armed forces; investigation to find out if policies were followed.

  • Bob Stewart Con Beckenham

    Question

    The MP is concerned about the BBC publishing secret information rather than passing it to the police or MOD. He inquires if procedures for safely carrying restricted documents out of secure locations have stopped.

    Minister reply

    Minister confirmed that policies and procedures are in place regarding document safety but these need to be investigated further to determine whether they were followed and if improvements are necessary.

  • Toby Perkins Lab Chesterfield

    Question

    The MP requests a commitment from the Minister for a statement on the Floor of the House upon conclusion of the investigation, avoiding another urgent question.

    Minister reply

    Minister assures that information regarding the outcome and any further tightening of procedures will be shared with the House.

  • Mark Logan Con Reading East

    Question

    The MP inquires if discussions have occurred between UK, Ukrainian government, and the ambassador to Ukraine concerning maintaining confidence with allies.

    Minister reply

    Minister confirms ongoing relationship with Ukraine but does not comment on specific details of conversations with friends and allies.

  • Deidre Brock SNP Edinburgh North and Leith

    Question

    The MP questions whether steps have been taken to secure the safety of service personnel in Afghanistan and on HMS Defender.

    Minister reply

    Minister confirms that all documents have been returned and necessary mitigating actions will be put in place.

  • Felicity Buchan Con South Norfolk

    Question

    The MP asks for confirmation regarding the safety of serving personnel following the loss of sensitive documents.

    Minister reply

    Minister assures that ongoing measures are taken to ensure safety and security of defence personnel.

  • Diana R. Johnson Lab Kingston upon Hull North

    Question

    The MP inquires about organisations involved in the investigation into document compromise.

    Minister reply

    Minister confirms that MOD police are involved and assures all relevant parties will participate.

  • Alec Shelbrooke Con Wetherby

    Question

    The MP asks if the Ministry of Defence is reassessing plans with allies regarding Afghanistan.

    Minister reply

    Minister confirms that developments in Afghanistan are constantly monitored and updated.

  • Jim Shannon DUP Strangford

    Question

    The MP questions about maintaining maritime freedoms alongside allies and the appropriate treatment of classified documents.

    Minister reply

    Minister assures that proper classification and secrecy of information are critical, investigation will test for necessary procedure changes.

  • Bill Wiggin Con North Herefordshire

    Question

    The MP expresses anger over security breach and requests reassurance regarding the punishment matching risk to personnel.

    Minister reply

    Minister emphasises the need for safety and security, confirming that investigation must be completed before further actions are considered.

  • Cat Smith Lab Lancaster and Wyre

    Question

    The MP questions if policies regarding secure document handling will change as a result of this incident.

    Minister reply

    Minister assures ongoing investigation, stating recommendations for tightening procedures will be taken seriously.

  • Bob Blackman Con Harrow East

    Question

    Questions the Minister about restrictions on taking classified documents out of the Ministry of Defence and why they were in physical form.

    Minister reply

    Confirms that there are restrictions on carrying paper documents out of the MOD, as tablets have better security protections. The investigation will determine whether these procedures were followed.

  • Question

    Concerned about potential weaknesses adversaries may find in operations and international rules adherence.

    Minister reply

    Reassures that the Royal Navy adheres to international rules and law of the sea, and confirms investigation will address whether our adversaries have sight of the documents.

  • Question

    Asks for assurance that the investigation will not be a blame game and Parliament will be informed of its results.

    Minister reply

    States the investigation is to find out what happened and learn for future prevention. Ensures the House will be advised of the conclusions.

  • Question

    Questions if the culprit, whether negligent or malicious, will face consequences.

    Minister reply

    Emphasises the need to investigate before making any judgements and ensures policies and procedures will be reviewed for improvement.

  • Question

    Suggests that if it was human recklessness, there needs to be serious consequences. Wants reassurance from investigation.

    Minister reply

    Will wait for the investigation's conclusion before determining whether policies need tightening or blame is assigned.

  • Question

    Asks about document security training at MOD, who receives it and how often.

    Minister reply

    Confirms that annual security briefings are mandated for all employees, including information on proper handling of documents.

  • Chris Bryant Lab Rhondda and Ogmore

    Question

    Expresses dissatisfaction with the Minister's response to the breach and questions why the Secretary of State is not present.

    Minister reply

    Explains that the Secretary of State cannot be present due to recent contact with someone who tested positive for covid-19.

  • Question

    Questions how the Government can reassure the public about similar breaches not happening in future, and asks for a more comprehensive investigation.

    Minister reply

    Acknowledges past data breaches but distinguishes this case as loss of physical documents. The investigation will determine prevention measures.

  • Luke Evans Con Hinckley and Bosworth

    Question

    Asks if there are drills for handling such 'never events' and suggests implementing them.

    Minister reply

    Confirms procedures are in place upon reporting lost documents, and the investigation will check whether actions were appropriate.

  • Tan Dhesi Lab Slough

    Question

    Inquires about safety of British troops and conversations with allies affected by this breach.

    Minister reply

    Reassures that there is no evidence of compromised personnel safety, but investigation will ensure mitigation if needed. Contacted US to inform them.

Shadow Comment

John Healey

Concerned about national security breaches involving classified MOD documents, including personal details of forces personnel and assessments on infantry battalions. Questions the level of “UK Eyes Only” classification, whether espionage has been ruled out, and if allies were informed immediately. Requests a full report from the investigation to be published for public reassurance.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy