Commons Sense

House of Commons · Adjournment Debate

Anti-loitering Devices: Safety

16 June 2021 · 1 other contributor

Opened by Giles Watling Con Clacton

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Giles Watling raised concerns about anti-loitering devices: safety in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

Key points

  • MP raised concerns about sonic anti-loitering devices being discriminatory and potentially harmful to health.
  • MP highlighted issues such as targeting young people and those with pre-existing conditions like autism.
  • Minister acknowledged concerns but stated devices do not present a safety risk under current regulations.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Giles Watling Con Clacton

The MP raised concerns about the use of sonic anti-loitering devices, arguing that they are discriminatory and potentially harmful to health. He highlighted issues such as targeting young people with painful pulsing sounds, lack of research on long-term effects, impact on those with pre-existing conditions like autism, and their ineffectiveness in deterring antisocial behaviour. The MP called for better regulation through licensing by local authorities, rather than an outright ban.

Other contributors (1)
  • Jim Shannon DUP Strangford

    The hon. Member emphasised the importance of protecting all children, especially vulnerable ones, from harmful devices.

Government Response

The Minister acknowledged the concerns raised by the MP and highlighted that the safety of these products falls under his ministerial portfolio as Consumer Minister. He discussed the regulatory framework in place for product safety, including the General Product Safety Regulations 2005 and other relevant laws. The current assessment is that such devices do not present a safety risk and there are no plans to introduce a licensing regime based on safety alone. However, he noted that concerns beyond safety—such as human rights considerations—are important and require further examination by relevant ministerial colleagues in other Departments. He also mentioned existing protections for freedom of assembly and statutory measures against antisocial behaviour. The Minister assured the MP that the Government will continue to review such issues and take appropriate steps where necessary.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy