Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

House Standards System: Confidentiality and Sanctions

21 April 2021 · 5 other contributors

Opened by Jacob Rees-Mogg Con North East Somerset

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Jacob Rees-Mogg raised concerns about house standards system: confidentiality and sanctions in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Moves motion to reaffirm commitment to ICGS and tackle bullying, harassment and sexual misconduct
  • Emphasises importance of confidentiality within the scheme
  • Agrees to recommendations by the Committee on Standards

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Jacob Rees-Mogg Con North East Somerset

Moves motion to reaffirm commitment to ICGS, tackle bullying, harassment and sexual misconduct, emphasises importance of confidentiality within the scheme and agrees to recommendations by the Committee on Standards. Additionally proposes amendments to Standing Order No. 150 and other related documents.

Other contributors (5)
  • Notices that amendment to motion 7 in the name of Andrea Leadsom has not been selected.

  • Valerie Vaz Lab Walsall and Bloxwich

    Expresses concern over the consultation process, noting that she was only informed days before publication. She thanks the Leader of the House for his statement but criticises the lack of transparency in the communication leading up to the debate.

  • Andrea Leadsom Con South Northamptonshire

    Welcomes the report from the Standards Committee on the Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme, stating it has provided a clear route to justice for everyone who visits or works in Parliament. Emphasises the importance of ongoing reviews and timely processes. Supports the establishment of an independent expert panel but raises concerns about constituents' representation if an MP is expelled.

  • Chris Bryant Lab Rhondda and Ogmore

    Discusses the importance of a clear code of conduct, confidentiality in investigations, ending the anomaly of non-confirmation by the commissioner, proposing more effective sanctions, clarifying mitigating and aggravating factors for sanctions, urging Members to seek advice from the Commissioner and Registrar, stressing that Officers are there to help Members.

  • Bernard Jenkin Con Harwich and North Essex

    Questions Chris Bryant about confidentiality arrangements in relation to Whips; discusses Members' wariness of approaching the commissioner for advice due to fear of judgment or repercussions, asks how to break down barriers between the commissioner and MPs.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy