Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Transport for the North: Funding

17 March 2021 · 4 other contributors

Opened by Diana R. Johnson Lab Kingston upon Hull North and Cottingham

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Diana R. Johnson raised concerns about transport for the north: funding in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.

Key points

  • Ms Diana R. Johnson expressed concern over a 40% reduction in Transport for the North's funding, noting delays in smart travel ticketing projects.
  • The core funding allocation for TfN was reduced from 10 million to 6 million.
  • The Minister stated that TfN's funding settlement is appropriate and fair, allowing it to carry out its statutory functions.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Diana R. Johnson Lab Kingston upon Hull North and Cottingham

Ms Diana R. Johnson raised concerns about a 40% cut in funding to Transport for the North, which she argued undermines levelling up promises. She noted that TfN's core funding allocation was reduced from £10 million to £6 million and smart travel ticketing projects were delayed due to lack of funds. Ms Johnson questioned the Government's commitment to devolution and economic regeneration in northern England.

Other contributors (4)
  • Diana R. Johnson Lab Kingston upon Hull North and Cottingham

    Ms Diana R. Johnson argued that the Prime Minister’s statement denying funding cuts was incorrect, highlighting that TfN’s core funding had been reduced by £4 million. She noted TfN's role in advising on rail investment and shaping projects but criticised the Government for not supporting key initiatives such as Northern Powerhouse Rail, which could contribute billions to the UK economy.

  • Andrew Stephenson Con Pendle

    Emphasised that delivering high-quality transport infrastructure in northern England is a top priority for the Government, and stated that Transport for the North’s funding settlement is appropriate and fair. He dismissed concerns about the funding settlement and urged Members to move on from discussing this issue.

  • Diana R. Johnson Lab Kingston upon Hull North and Cottingham

    Questioned whether the budget for Transport for the North, which was £10 million, has been reduced to £6 million. She also raised concerns about the Minister's conduct during the debate.

  • Commented that Diana R. Johnson's point was not a formal point of order but noted that it is up to the Member in charge of the Adjournment debate to take a reasonable amount of time and that the Minister has adequate time to respond.

Government Response

Transport for the North’s funding settlement is appropriate and fair and enables it to continue to carry out its statutory functions. The Minister dismissed concerns about the funding settlement and urged Members to focus on delivering for the north.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy