House of Commons · Bill Debate
12 March 2021 · 5 other contributors
Opened by Christopher Chope Con Christchurch
Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.
Christopher Chope raised concerns about cosmetic procedures on young people bill - clause 5 in the House of Commons. A government minister responded. Other MPs also contributed.
Key points
Key requests to Government
Question put and agreed to. Bill read the Third time and passed.
MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.
Opened the debate
I beg to move amendment 1, page 3, line 29, leave out clause 5. This amendment seeks to remove Clause 5 which provides the power to make consequential provision. The argument is that these provisions could be vague and create potential regulatory overreach.
This amendment will incorporate into the Bill the guidance for policy makers issued in August 2010 that there should be two common commencement dates each year, one of which is 1st October. It aims to ensure consistent introduction of changes affecting businesses.
Consequential provisions are essential to ensure consistency with other legislation and allow necessary adjustments to human medicines regulations under the Bill. They help in making informed decisions about regulations.
I have been reassured by the answers given and do not intend to support either amendment or delay proceedings further. This implies neutrality towards the specific amendment on Clause 5.
The Government supports the legislation, believing it is an important step in protecting young people from potential harm caused by cosmetic procedures. The Minister's support shows that the amendment to remove Clause 5 does not align with the government's view of ensuring necessary safeguards.
This Bill addresses issues such as the lack of medical or psychological assessments for children accessing botulinum toxin and cosmetic filler procedures. The amendment aims to avoid potential health risks associated with these practices.
Government Response
The Government supports the legislation, acknowledging the importance of protecting young people from potential harm caused by cosmetic procedures. It reiterates that standards set by the General Medical Council already require doctors to consider the best interests of patients.