Commons Sense

House of Commons · General Debate

Covid-19: Limited Company Directors

25 January 2021 · 3 other contributors

Opened by Owen Thompson SNP Midlothian

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Owen Thompson raised concerns about covid-19: limited company directors in the House of Commons. Other MPs contributed to the debate.

Key points

  • Mr Thompson opened the debate by stating that approximately 3 million people were excluded from financial aid during the crisis, highlighting the plight of small limited company directors.
  • He emphasized that these directors are hardworking and innovative entrepreneurs whose livelihoods have been severely impacted due to their exclusion from support schemes like furlough or grants.
  • Mr Thompson welcomed a recent proposal by an all-party parliamentary group for a targeted income grant scheme aimed at supporting excluded groups.

How the debate unfolded

MPs spoke in turn to share their views and ask questions. Here's what each person said.

Opened the debate

Owen Thompson SNP Midlothian

Mr Thompson opened the debate by emphasising that the Government's failure to support approximately 3 million people who were excluded from financial aid during the crisis is unacceptable. He highlighted the plight of small limited company directors, stating that these individuals are not fat cats but hardworking and innovative entrepreneurs whose livelihoods have been severely impacted due to their exclusion from support schemes like furlough or grants. Mr Thompson welcomed a recent proposal by an all-party parliamentary group for a targeted income grant scheme, which he hopes the Treasury will take seriously and work with excluded groups to implement.

Other contributors (3)
  • Owen Thompson SNP Midlothian

    Mr Thompson argued that limited company directors are not wealthy individuals but rather small business owners who have been unfairly penalized due to the way they structure their income. He cited statistics indicating that 2 million micro and small companies in the UK employ 7.5 million people, many of whom have struggled to access support during the crisis. Mr Thompson called for immediate action from the Treasury to address the issues faced by these groups, emphasising both the moral imperative and the economic benefits of providing support.

  • Caroline Lucas Green Brighton, Pavilion

    I am hugely grateful to the hon. Member for Midlothian (Owen Thompson) for allowing me to say a few words in this vital debate. I want to check that the Minister, the Chancellor and Treasury officials fully understand that the DISS proposal does not use dividend payments as the basis for calculating income support for directors but is based on CT600 taxable profits. As Northern Ireland has managed to develop a scheme that meets its high standards on avoiding fraud, can the Minister explain why it has been difficult for the Treasury? Will he correct the impression that directors of limited companies are less trustworthy than others who have benefited from Government support? If the DISS does not meet with Treasury approval, will the Minister commit to finding an alternative solution? Small limited company directors have received no income support since March last year and they are desperate. Up to 7.5 million UK jobs are reliant on small limited companies. The Government's actions are economically illiterate and morally untenable.

  • Jesse Norman Con Hereford and South Herefordshire

    I congratulate the hon. Member for Midlothian on securing this debate, his contribution, and his tenacity in persisting with a debate on Burns night. The Government have provided a wide-ranging package of financial support worth £280 billion to individuals and businesses throughout the pandemic. Directors who pay themselves a salary through a PAYE scheme are eligible for the furlough scheme but dividends are not covered by this scheme nor by the self-employment income support scheme. We recognise that some company directors do not qualify for either support scheme due to the limitations of HMRC’s current reporting mechanisms. The Government continue to work closely with organisations to explore how these schemes can better support directors and others who have found themselves ineligible for main income support schemes. I am very grateful for the care and support that has gone into drawing up the proposal for the DISS, but as framed it does not overcome the fundamental issues of protecting taxpayers’ money and safeguarding against fraud and abuse.

Get updates like this by email
▸ Assessment & feedback
Summary accuracy